Articles

PERSPECTIVE ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM-CLIMATE INTERACTION

Expand
  • ①Department of Geography,University of Maryland,Maryland,US;②Institute of Geography,CAS,Beijing 100101,China

Received date: 1999-10-13

  Revised date: 2000-01-10

  Online published: 2000-08-01

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems and climatic systems influence each other through biophysical processes that involve the transfers of energy and water at the land surface and biogeochemical cycles that affect the concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. Studies of ecosystem-climate interactions have evolved from uses of land surface parameterizations (LSPs) to sensitivity analysis of climatic responses to equilibrium ecosystem changes and to dynamic, interactive coupling of ecosystem and climatic processes. System modeling is the most important means to study ecosystem-climate interactions.
The global ecosystem models that have been used in the studies can be classified into biophysical, biogeography, and biogeochemical types.Ecosystem changes as a whole in the past have accelerated warming by increasing the emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O and reducing the regulation of vegetation to water cycling.Ecosystem negative feed-backs on climate have emerged with increases in CO2sequestration and the stabilization of CH4emissions,but continued increases in anthropogenic N2fixation may greatly enhance N2O emissions. To quantify accurately the feedback effects requires investigations of the dynamic ecosystem-climate interactions at seasonal and interannual scales. Future studies should focus on both developing integrated dynamic ecosystem models (IDEM) that can describing both functional and structural changes and coupling biophysical and biogeochemical processes and observing large-scale, long-term ecosystem changes. The observations are essential for deepening understanding of ecosystem-climate interactions and validate global ecosystem models.

Cite this article

CAO Ming-kui,LI Ke-rang . PERSPECTIVE ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM-CLIMATE INTERACTION[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2000 , 15(4) : 446 -452 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2000.04.0446

References

[1]Tans P P, Fung I Y, Takahashi T. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2budget[J]. Science, 1990,247: 1 431~1 438.
[2]Prentice I C, Cramer W, Harrison S P,et al. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties, and climate [J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1992, 19: 117~134.
[3]Neilson R P. A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance [J]. Ecol Appl, 1995, 5:362~385.
[4]Parton W J, Scurlock J M O, Ojima D S. Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993,7: 785~809.
[5]Raich J W, Rastetter E B, Melillo J M,et al. Potential net primary productivity in southern America: application of a global model [J]. Ecological Application, 1991, 1: 399~429.
[6]Smith T M, Shugart HH. The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate[J]. Nature, 1993,361: 523~526.
[7]Woodward F I, Lomas M R, Betts R A. Vegetation-climate feedbacks in greenhouse world [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1998,353B: 29~39.
[8]Sellers P J, Bounoua L, Collatz G L,et al. Comparison of radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2on climate [J]. Science, 1996, 271: 1 402~1 406.
[9]Betts R A, Cox P M, Lee S E,et al. Contrasting physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks in climate change simulation [J]. Nature, 1997,387: 796.
[10]Running S W, Gower S T. FOREST-BGC, a general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional application,II, dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets [J]. Tree Physiol, 1991,9: 147~160.
[11]Woodward F I, Smith T M, Emanuel W R. A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1995,9: 471~490.
[12]Cao M K, Woodward F I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change [J]. Nature, 1998, 393: 249~252.
[13]Cao M K, Woodward F I. Net primary and ecosystem production and carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems and their response to climatic change [J], Global Change Biology,1998, 4:185~198.
[14]Cao M K, Gregson K, Marshall S. Methane emission from wetlands and its sensitivity to climate change [J], Atmospheric Environment, 1998,32: 3 293~3 299.
[15]Shugart H H, Smith T M, Post W M. The application of individual-based simulation model for assessing the effects of global change [J] . Annu Rev Ecol Systematics, 1992,23:15~38.
[16]Foley J A, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N,et al. An integrated biosphere model of land-surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1996,10: 603~628.
[17]Friend A D, Stevens A K, Knox R G. A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid 3.0)[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1997, 95: 249~287.
[18]Tood T L, Schneider S H. Ecology and climate: research strategies and implications [J]. Science, 1995, 269: 334~340.
[19]Cao M K, Marshall S J, Gregson K. Global carbon exchange and methane emission in natural wetlands: an application of a process-based model [J]. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 14 399~14 414.
[20]Li C, Frolking S E, Frolking T A. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: I model structure and sensitivity [J]. J Geophys Res, 1992, 97: 9 759~9 776.

Outlines

/