Articles

A Case Study of the International Ecosystem Assessment

  • YU Xiubo ,
  • 4 ,
  • ZHOU Yangming
Expand
  • 1. Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China;2. Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;3. Office of the Mountain-River-Lake Development Committee of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330046, China;4. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2008-05-21

  Revised date: 2008-10-11

  Online published: 2008-11-10

Abstract

In order to provide ecological information for public and decision-makers, some ecosystem assessment projects were implemented in the international society. Those cases could be classified into two development directions of ecosystem assessment: One inclined to report the state of ecosystems in an objective way, such as NRC's report and Heinz′s report; the other was prone to link the ecosystems to social-economic system so that concrete policy recommendations can be put forward, such as Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) and Global Environment Outlook(UNEP GEO). After those cases were analyzed comprehensively, some experiences or characteristics about those assessment projects were summarized as follows: (1)Suitable ecological indicators should be identified; (2)Reasonable conceptual framework is the core of ecosystem assessment; (3)In order to put forward policy recommendations, the linkage between ecosystems and social economic systems should be established; (4)Ecosystem assessment should be repeated periodically or irregularly; (5)Stakeholders from government, the private sector, environmental organizations, academia and the general public should be involved. In order to make the assessments contribute to ecological policy-making and the regional sustainable development, the two development directions should be integrated.

Cite this article

YU Xiubo , 4 , ZHOU Yangming . A Case Study of the International Ecosystem Assessment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2008 , 23(11) : 1209 -1217 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2008.11.1209

References

[1] MAMillennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being:A Framework for Aassessment[M]. Washington DC:Island Press,2003.

[2] MAMillennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M]. Washington DC:Island Press,2005.

[3] Foley J A,DeFries R,Asner G P,et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science,2005,3095 734:570-574.

[4] Vitousek P M,Mooney H A,Lubchenco J,et al. Human domination of earth's ecosystems[J]. Science,1997,2775 325:494-499.

[5] Niemi G J,McDonald M E. Application of ecological indicators[J]. Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics,2004,35:89-111.

[6] Turnhout E,Hisschemoller M,Eijsackers H. Ecological indicators:Between the two fires of science and policy[J]. Ecological Indicators,2007,72:215-228.

[7] Lovett G M,Burns D A,Driscoll C T,et al. Who needs environmental monitoring?[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2007,55:253-260.

[8] Annan K A. We the peoples:The role of the united nations in the 21st century[R]. New York,NY:United Nations,2000.

[9] Ayensu E,Claasen D V R,Collins M,et al. International ecosystem assessment[J]. Science,1999,2865 440:685-686.

[10] Ramankutty N,Foley J A,Olejniczak N J. People on the land: Changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century[J]. AMBIO,2002,313:251-257.

[11] Sun Honglie. The Chinese ecosystem research network can provides scientific and technological supports for ecosystem assessment[J]. Resources Science,2006,284:2-3. [孙鸿烈. 中国生态系统研究网络为生态系统评估提供科技支撑[J]. 资源科学,2006,284:2-3.]

[12] Li Wenhua. Ecosystem services research is the core of ecosystem assessment [J]. Resources Science,2006,284:4. [李文华. 生态系统服务研究是生态系统评估的核心[J]. 资源科学,2006,284:4. ]

[13] NRCNational Research Council. Ecological Indicators for the Nation[M]. Washington DC:National Academies Press,2000.

[14] Niemeijer D. Developing indicators for environmental policy: Data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2002,52:91-103.

[15] The Heinz Center. The State of the Nation's Ecosystems:Measuring the Lands,Waters,and Living Resources of the United States[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,2002.

[16] O'Malley R O,Cavender-Bares K,Clark W C. Providing "Better" Data:Not as simple as it might seem[J]. Environment,2003,454:8-18.

[17] Meyerson L A,Baron J,Melillo J M,et al. Aggregate measures of ecosystem services: Can we take the pulse of nature?[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2005,31:56-59.

[18] Brovkin V,House J I,DeFries R S. New assessment focuses on ecosystems,human well-being,and the climate system[J]. EOS Transactions AGU,2006,875:50.

[19] Tallis H M,Kareiva P. Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2006,2110:562-568.

[20] Zhao Shidong,Zhang Yongmin. Ecosystems and human well-being:The achievements,contributions and prospects of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2006,219:896-902. [赵士洞,张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J]. 地球科学进展,2006,219:896-902.]

[21] Mooney H A,Cropper A,Reid W. The millennium ecosystem assessment:What is it all about?[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2004,195:221-224.

[22]  UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme. Global Environment Outlook 3: Past,Present and Future Perspectives[M]. London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.,2002.

[23]  UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme. UNEP Year Book 2003-08[R]. Nairobi,Kenya:United Nations Environment Programme,2003-08.

[24] UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme. Global Environment Outlook 4:Environment for Development[M]. Valletta,Malta:Progress Press Ltd.,2007.

[25] Svarstad H,Petersen L K,Rothman D,et al. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR[J]. Land Use Policy,2008,251:116-125.

[26] Fu BoJie,Liu Shiliang,Ma Keming. The contents and methods of Integrated Ecosystem AssessmenIEA[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2001,2111:1 185-1 892.[傅伯杰,刘世梁,马克明. 生态系统综合评价的内容与方法[J]. 生态学报,2001,2111:1 185-1 892.]

[27] Zhang Zhicheng,Niu Haishan,Ouyang Hua. Ecosystem health: Concept analysis[J]. Resources Science,2005,271:136-145. [张志诚,牛海山,欧阳华. “生态系统健康内涵探讨[J]. 资源科学,2005,271:136-145.]

[28] Rapport D J,Costanza R,McMichael A J. Assessing ecosystem health[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1998,1310:397-402.

[29] Farber S,Costanza R,Childers D L,et al. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management[J]. BioScience,2006,562:121-133.

[30] US EPA. A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological condition: A science advisory board report[R]. EPA-SAB-EPEC-02 009. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency,2002.

[31] Yoccoz N G,Nichols J D,Boulinier T. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2001,168:446-453.

[32] MAMillennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Current States and Trends [M]. Washtington Covelo London:Island Press,2005.

[33] Palmer M A,Bernhardt E S,Chornesky E A,et al. Ecological science and sustainability for a crowded planet: 21st century vision and action plan for the ecological society of America[R]. The Ecological Society of America,2004.

Outlines

/