Articles

Modeling Carbon Exchange in Different Forest Ecosystems by CEVSA Model: Comparison with Eddy Covariance Measurements

Expand
  • 1.Synthesis Research Center of CERN, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,China; 2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100039,China

Received date: 2006-10-16

  Revised date: 2007-01-29

  Online published: 2007-03-10

Abstract

 The model of Carbon Exchange in the Vegetation-Soil-Atmosphere (CEVSA) is an ecosystem mechanical model to simulate energy transfers and water, carbon and nitrogen cycles based on ecophysiological processes. It has been widely used at the scales of regional and global; however, the description of water and carbon fluxes have not yet been evaluated and validated at ecosystem scale. The revised CEVSA model incorporates several significant improvements over the previous version of CEVSA. Using data from eddy covariance measurements in three different forest ecosystems, which represent the temperate mixed forest, temperate deciduous forest and sub-tropical coniferous forest, respectively, we tested and evaluated the previous and revised CEVSA model. The revised and previous model both can simulate the seasonal variation of carbon exchange in different forest ecosystem, and the revised model simulated much better the temporal variation and magnitude of carbon exchange than the previous model did. However, systematic errors in flux simulation were also identified for particular time of season in different ecosystems. The present study shows that the revised CEVSA model can simulate the seasonal pattern and magnitude of CO2 fluxes, but further improvement in calibrating the model simulation, especially in the responses and adaptability of photosynthesis and respiration to environment change, is required.

Cite this article

GU Feng-xue, [CAO Ming-kui], YU Gui-rui, TAO Bo, WEN Xue-fa, LIU Yun-fen,et al . Modeling Carbon Exchange in Different Forest Ecosystems by CEVSA Model: Comparison with Eddy Covariance Measurements[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007 , 22(3) : 313 -321 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2007.03.0313

References

[1]Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems [J]. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190.
[2]IPCC. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis [M]. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[3]Melillo J M, McGuire A D, Kicklighter D W, et al.Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production [J]. Nature, 1993, 363:234-240.
[4]Cox P M, Betts R A, Jones C D, et al. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model [J].Nature, 2000, 408: 184-187.
[5]Song C H, Woodcock C E. A regional forest ecosystem carbon budget model: Impacts of forest age structure and landuse history [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 164: 33-47.
[6]Cao Mingkui, Yu Guirui, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Multi-scale observation and cross-scale mechanistic modeling on terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle [J]. Science in China (Series D),2005, 48 (suppl.Ⅰ): 17-32.
[7]Lloyd J, Grace J, Miranda A C, et al. A simple calibrated model of Amazon rainforest productivity based on leaf biochemical properties [J].Plant Cell and Environment,1995, 18: 1 129-1 145.
[8]Baldocchi D D. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: Past, present and future [J].Global Change Biology,2003, 9: 479-492.
[9]Yu Guirui, Zhang Leiming, Sun Xiaoming, et al. Advances in carbon flux observation and research in Asia[J].Science in China (Series D),2005, 48(suppl.Ⅰ):1-16.
[10]Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L H, et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2001, 82: 2 415-2 434.
[11]Falge E, Baldocchi D, Tenhunen J, et al. Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2002, 113: 53-74.
[12]Baldocchi D D, Wilson K B. Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaved forest across hourly to decadal time scales [J]. Ecological Modelling,2001, 142: 155-184.
[13]Running S W, Baldocchi D D, Turner D P, et al. A global terrestrial monitoring network integrating tower fluxes, flask sampling, ecosystem modeling and EOS satellite data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,1999, 70: 108-127.
[14]Ito A, Saigusa N, Murayama S, et al. Modeling of gross and net carbon dioxide exchange over a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest in Japan: Analysis of seasonal and interannual change [J]. Agricultureal and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 134: 122-134.
[15]Kramer K, Leinonen I, Bartelink H H, et al. Evaluation of six process-based forest growth models using eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six sites in Europe [J]. Global Change Biology, 2002, 8: 213-230.
[16]Kucharik C J, Barford C C, Maayar M E, et al. A multiyear evaluation of a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model at three AmeriFlux forest sites: Vegetation structure, phenology, soil temperature, and CO2and H2O vapor exchange [J]. Ecological Modelling,2005, 196: 1-31.
[17]Hanan N P, Berry J A, Verma S B, et al. Testing a model of CO2, water and energy exchange in Great Plains tallgrass prairie and wheat ecosystems [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2005, 131: 162-179.
[18]Cao M K, Woodward F I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change [J]. Nature, 1998,393: 249-252.
[19]Cao M K, Woodward F I. Net primary and ecosystem production and carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems and their responses to climate change [J]. Global Change Biology,1998, 4: 185-198. 
[20]Cao M K, Zhang Q F, Shugart H H. Dynamic responses of African ecosystem carbon cycling to climate change [J]. Climate Research,2001,17: 183-193. 
[21]Cao M K, Prince S D. Increasing terrestrial carbon uptake from 1980's to the 1990's with changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 [J]. Global Biogeochemical cycles,2002, 16(4): 1-11.
[22]Cao M K, Tao B, Li K R, et al.Interannual variation in terrestrial ecosystem carbon fluxes in China from 1981-1998 [J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003, 45(5): 552-560.
[23]Ren Chuanyou, Yu Guirui, Wang Qiufeng, et al. Photosynthesis-transpiration coupling model at canopy scale in terrestrial ecosystem [J]. Science in China (Series D), 2005, 48 (suppl.Ⅰ): 160-171.
[24]Wen Xuefa. Measurements of Carbon Sequestration by Long-term eddy Covariance in a Mid-subtropical Pinus Plantation of Southeastern China[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, 2005.[温学发.中亚热带红壤丘陵人工林生态系统CO2通量观测及其季节动态特征[D].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,2005.]
[25]Woodward F I, Smith T M, Emanuel W R. A global land primary productivity and phytogeography [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1995, 9(4): 471-490.
[26]Gu Fengxue, Cao Mingkui, Wen Xuefa, et al. A comparison between simulated and measured CO2 and water flux in a sub-tropical coniferous forest [J]. Science in China (Series D),2006, 36 (suppl.Ⅱ): 241-251. 
[27]Arora V K, Boer G J. A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models[J].Global Change Biology, 2005, 11: 39-59.
[28]Law B E, Williams M, Anthoni P M, et al. Measuring and modeling seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa forest subject to soil water deficit [J].Global Change Biology,2000, 6: 613-630.
[29]Larcher W. Physiology Plant Ecology [M]. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1980.
[30]Gordon W S. Climate Change, Hydrology, and Ecological Models: Intercomparison and Validation[D]. Austin: The Univeristy of Texas,2003.
[31]Dufrêne E, Davi H, Frangois C, et al. Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest Part I: Model description and uncerntainty analysis on modeled NEE [J].Ecological Modelling,2005, 185: 407-436.
[32]Grant R F, Arain A, Arora V, et al. Intercomparison of techniques to model high temperature effects on CO2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal coniferous forests [J]. Ecological Modelling,2005, 188: 217-252.
[33]Hanson P J, Wullschleger S D, Norby R J, et al. Importance of changing CO2, temperature, precipitation and ozone on carbon and water cycles of an upland-oak forest: Incorporating experimental results into model simulations[J].Global Change Biology,2005,11:1 402-1 423.

Outlines

/