Advances in Earth Science ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 111-123. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2024.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Review of the Models for Riverine Carbon Cycling

Jiaojiao LIU 1 , 2( ), Junzhi LIU 1( ), Chao SONG 3, Weizhen ZHANG 1, Yongqin LIU 1 , 4 , 5   

  1. 1.Center for the Pan-third Pole Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    2.College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    3.Institute of Innovation Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    4.State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2023-10-03 Revised:2024-01-22 Online:2024-02-10 Published:2024-03-05
  • Contact: Junzhi LIU E-mail:liujiaojiao21@lzu.edu.cn;liujunzhi@lzu.edu.cn
  • About author:LIU Jiaojiao, Ph. D student, research area includes watershed carbon cycling model. E-mail: liujiaojiao21@lzu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42171132);The Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China(23JRRA1033)

Jiaojiao LIU, Junzhi LIU, Chao SONG, Weizhen ZHANG, Yongqin LIU. Review of the Models for Riverine Carbon Cycling[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2024, 39(2): 111-123.

Rivers connect the terrestrial landscape and oceans and are considered “bioreactors” of carbon. Understanding the carbon cycling processes in rivers and constructing numerical models for riverine carbon cycling is imperative to estimate regional and global carbon budgets. The summary and discussion of the development and application of riverine carbon cycling models remains inadequate. This study reviewed the mechanisms and models of riverine carbon cycling based on a comprehensive literature review. First, we briefly overview the critical processes in migrating and transforming various carbon components, including particulate organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and dissolved organic carbon. Riverine carbon cycling models are classified into two types: statistical and process-based. The representative models’ simulation methods, applications, advantages, and disadvantages were compared. Based on statistical or machine learning methods, empirical statistical models establish the relationship between the riverine carbon flux and environmental factors. This type of model is simple but has poor extrapolation and universality. Process-based models are based on land surface or hydrological models coupled with river carbon cycling-related biogeochemical processes. This model simulates and predicts variations in different riverine carbon fluxes and is more reliable but complicated. Such models typically focus on different scientific problems, and the representations of riverine carbon cycling-related processes differ among these models. Simulation research on riverine carbon cycling is still in its early stages; however, many shortcomings remain. For example, the representations of terrestrial and aquatic carbon cycling and human activities in existing riverine carbon cycling models are insufficient; thus, they cannot accurately simulate and predict long-term changes in riverine carbon cycling. In the future, it will be necessary to strengthen observations of river carbon cycling processes and improve our understanding of terrestrial and aquatic carbon cycling to represent the mechanisms and processes in the model. This will improve the accuracy of riverine carbon cycling simulations and provide a scientific basis for China to achieve its double-carbon goals.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract