Please wait a minute...
img img
Adv. Search
Advances in Earth Science  2000, Vol. 15 Issue (6): 734-740    DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2000.06.0734
Articles     
NEW AND POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGY FOR OBSERVATION OF EARTH FROM SPACE:SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR INTERFEROMETRY
LIU Guo-xiang,DING Xiao-li,CHEN Yong-qi,LI Zhi-lin,ZHENG Da-wei①②
①Dept.of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics,Hong Kong Polytechnic University;②Shanghai Astronomical Observatory,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 200030,China
Download:  PDF (449KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (InSAR) is a new and potential technology that has been developed in the last decade or so for observation of the Earth. It can be used to generate large-area (even global) DEM or to detect Earth surface deformation by means of interferometric phase data and attitude data of the radar platform. In particular, Differential InSAR (D-InSAR) has been demonstrated to have unprecedented ability to measure and monitor Earth surface change with excellent characteristics of continuous spatial coverage and nearly automatic processing and high accuracy (up to cm-level or even better). This paper first introduces the basic principles of InSAR and D-InSAR, and summarizes the involved key processing algorithms of interferometric technology, including SAR images coregistration,
phase unwrapping and baseline estimationetc. Then, some factors, that affect the quality of interferometric products, are generally analyzed,i.e., phase quality and baseline parameters play very important roles on interferometric processes. Finally, emphasis is placed on reviewing D-InSAR applications in measuring and monitoring Earth surface deformations caused by earthquakes, post-seismic displacements, ground subsidence, landslides and volcanic movements.

Key words:   SAR interferometry      Differential InSAR      Digital elevation model      Earth surface deformation.     
Received:  04 January 2000      Published:  01 December 2000
P237  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors

Cite this article: 

LIU Guo-xiang,DING Xiao-li,CHEN Yong-qi,LI Zhi-lin,ZHENG Da-wei. NEW AND POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGY FOR OBSERVATION OF EARTH FROM SPACE:SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR INTERFEROMETRY. Advances in Earth Science, 2000, 15(6): 734-740.

URL: 

http://www.adearth.ac.cn/EN/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2000.06.0734     OR     http://www.adearth.ac.cn/EN/Y2000/V15/I6/734

[1] 舒宁.雷达遥感原理[M].北京:测绘出版社,1996. 12~35.
[2] Achache J, Fruneau B, Delacourt C. Applicability of SAR interferometry for operational monitoring of landslides[A].In: Proceedings of the Second ERS Applications Workshop[C]. London, 1995. 165~168.
[3] Alberti G, Esposito S, Ponte S. Three-dimensional digital elevation model of Mt. Vesuvius from NASA/JPL TOPSAR[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996, 17(10):1 797~1 801.
[4] Atlantis Scientific Incorporation. EVInSAR User' s Guide[Z].Canada: Atlantis Scientific Incorporation, 1999. 13~17.
[5] Briole P, Massonnet D, Delacourt C. Post-eruptive deformation associated with the 1986-87 and 1989 lava flows of Etna detected by radar interferometry [J].Geophysical Research Letters, 1997, 24: 37~40.
[6] Carnec C, King C, Massonnet D. Measurement of land subsidence by means of differential SAR interferometry[A].In: Proceedins of the Fifth International Symposium on Land Subsidence[C]. The Hague, The Netherlands, 1995. 139~148.
[7] Fruneau B, Delacourt C, Achache J. Observation and modeling of the Saint-Etienne-de-Tin landslide using SAR interferometry[EB/OL]. FRINGE 96, 1996, http://www.geo.unizh.ch/rsl/ fringe96/papers.
[8] Fujiwara S, Rosen P A. Crustal deformation measurements using repeat-pass JERS-1 Sythetic Radar Interferometry near the Izu Peninsula, Japan [ J ]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(B2): 2 411~2 426.
[9] Gabriel A K, Goldstein R M, Zebker H A. Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: differential radar interferometry[J]. Jounal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94(B7):9 183~9 191.
[10] Gens R, Van Genderen J L. SAR interferometry: issues,techniques, applications[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996, 17(10): 1 803~1 835.
[11] Gens R. Quality assessment of SAR interferometry data[D].Hannover: Hannover University, 1998. 23~45.
[12] Ghiglia D C, Pritt M D. Two-dimensional Phase Unwrapping: Theory, Algorithms and Software [M].New York: John Wiley &Sons, INC, 1998. 1~38.
[13] Goldstein R M. Satellite radar interferometry for monitoring ice sheet motion, application to an Antarctic ice stream[J].Science, 1993, 262: 1 525~1 530.
[14] Goldstein R M. Atmospheric limitations to repeat-track radar interferometry[J]. Geophysical Research Letter, 1995, 22:2 517~2 520.
[15] Kwok R, Fahnestock M A. Ice sheet motion and topography from radar interferometry [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, 34(1): 189~200.
[16] Li F K, Goldstein R M. Studies of multibaseline spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radars [J] . IEEE Transactions On Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1990, 28:88~97.
[17] Massonnet D, Rossi M, Carmona C,et al. The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry[J]. Nature, 1993, 364: 138~142.
[18] Massonnet D, Feigl K L. Satellite radar interferometric map of the coseismic deformation fileld of the M=6.1 Eureka Valley, California earthquake of May 17, 1993 [J].Geophysical Research Letter, 1995, 22: 1 541~1 544.
[19] Massonnet D, Briole P, Arnaud A. Deflation of Mount Etna monitored by spaceborne radar interferometry[J]. Nature,1995, 375: 567~570.
[20] Massonnet D, Vadon H. Land subsidence caused by the East Mesa geothermal field, California, observed by SAR interferometry[J]. Geophysical Research Letter, 1997, 24(8):2 677~2 680.
[21] Massonnet D, Holzer T, Vadon H. Land subsidence caused by the East Mesa geothermal filed, California, observed using SAR interferometry [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1997, 23(19): 2 677~2 680.
[22] Murakami M. Coseismic crustal deformations of 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake detected by interferometric JERS-1 synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 101(B4): 8 605~8 614.
[23] Peltzer G, Hudnut K W, Feigl K L. Analysis of coseismic surface displacement gradients using radar interferometry:New insights into the Landers earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(B11): 21 971~21 981.
[24] Peltzer G, Rosen P. Surfacement of the 17 May 1993 Eureka Valley, California, Earthquake Observed by SAR Interferometry[J]. Science, 1995, 268: 1 333~1 336.
[25] Ponte S. ERS tandem data for earthquake prediction:preliminary results[EB/OL]. http://earth1. esrin.esa.it/florence/.1997.
[26] Santitamnont P. Interferometric SAR processing for topographic mapping [D]. Hannover: Hannover University, 1998. 1~30.
[27] Small D. Generation of Digital Elevation Models through Spaceborne SAR Interferometry [D]. Zurich: University of Zurich, 1998. 3~50.
[28] Zebker H A,Goldstein R M. Topographic mapping from interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar observations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986, 91: 4 993~4 999.
[29] Zebker H A, Rosen P A, Goldstein R M,et al. On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: The Landers Earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(B10): 19 617~9 634.

No Suggested Reading articles found!