收稿日期: 2005-12-20
修回日期: 2006-01-16
网络出版日期: 2006-02-15
基金资助
国家863计划重大专项资助项目“渤海海冰资源开发与农业综合利用技术研究”（编号：2004AA2Z4020）；国家自然科学基金重点项目“渤海海冰作为淡水资源的储量测算”（编号：40335048）资助.
The Effect of Storm Surge on Soil Salt Content of the Farmlands along the Bohai Bay in China
Received date: 2005-12-20
Revised date: 2006-01-16
Online published: 2006-02-15
2003年10月11日渤海湾沧州范围内发生特大温带风暴潮，其摧毁沿岸养殖场后涌向沿海农田区域，海水倒灌农田浸泡持续时间达10~15 d不等。2004年5月3日，对浸泡农田土壤采样进行盐分分析，结果表明，经海水浸泡后农田全部盐碱化，且盐分主要聚集在土壤表层；46%的土地出现碱斑，0~90 cm土体内土壤含盐量较浸泡前普遍增加，0~10 cm表层含盐量高达1.134%；浸泡后0~25 cm土体内含盐离子组成较之浸泡前有显著变化，Cl－含量增加了33.3%，Na++K+含量增加了39.4%；降雨淋溶可以使土壤盐分含量明显下降，且为主要影响因素；经过一年后，土壤盐分含量降低到0.308%，而两年后，受灾土壤盐分含量降低到0.265%左右，可以种植耐盐性较强的作物。
吴之正 , 张国明 , 史培军 , 顾卫 . 渤海湾风暴潮倒灌对沿岸农田土壤盐分的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006 , 21(2) : 157 -160 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.02.0157
On October 11, 2003, a huge storm surge attacked the Changzhou region in the Bohai bay of China. The surge smashed the shrimp breeding fields and flooded the coastal farms. These farms were inundated for a period from 10 days to 15 days. On May 3, 2004, a salinity analysis was carried out for the soil samples from the seawatersoaked farms. Result shows that these farms had all been salinized: 46% of the lands had alkali pots; the content of salts in the soil (0~90cm) had increased evidently while the salts mainly concentrated at the surface layer (0~10cm), where the salt content was as high as 1.134%; constitutes of saline ions at the 0~25cm layer also changed greatly: the Cl－increased for 33.3%, while the Na+ and K+ altogether increased for 39.4%. It is found that rainfall is an effective and also primary way to desalinize these soils. Two years after the storm surge, salt content of the affected soils had dropped to around 0.265%, at which level some salt-enduring crops can be grown.
Key words： Storm surge; Salt content; Effect; Farmlands.
[1] Yang Guishan. Historical change and future trends of storm surge disaster in China’s coastal area[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2000,9(3):23-30. [杨桂山. 中国沿海风暴潮灾害的历史变化及未来趋向[J].自然灾害学报,2000,9(3):23-30.]
[2] Hu Xin, Jing Hua, Wang Fuxia, et al. Analysis of synoptic system and wind-field structure of a storm surge in Bohai Sea[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2005,33(3):235-239.[胡欣,景华,王福侠,等.渤海湾风暴潮天气系统及风场结构个例分析[J].气象科技,2005,33(3):235-239.]
[3] Zhang Xueying, Shao Rongmin, Gao Mengchuan. Research on the cause of formation of the coastal sea storm in Tianjin and its prevention and reduction measure[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2005,21(2):60-63.[张雪莹,邵荣敏,高孟川. 天津沿海风暴潮的成因与防灾减灾措施研究[J].天津理工大学学报,2005,21(2):60-63.]
[4] Zhang Zhiyue. Analysis of Cangzhou sea border 10.11 huge storm surge cause of formation[J]. Marine Forecasts, 2004, 21(2):74-77.[张志悦. 沧州沿海“10.11”特大温带风暴潮灾情成因分析[J].海洋预报,2004, 21(2):74-77.]
[5] Cui Jianyun,Xu Wenzheng,Gao Xiaomei,et al. Analysis of storm tide and rainstorm of Shandong on 2003 Oct.11-12[J]. Journal of Shandong Meteorology, 2005,(2):19-21.[崔建云,徐文正,高晓梅,等.2003年10月11/12日山东暴雨及风暴潮分析[J].山东气象,2005,(2):19-21.]
[6] Ye Xujun,Wang Zhaoqian,Wang Chenghong,et al. Impacts of typhoon storm on farmland ecological environments in the eastern coastal area of Zhejiang Province and their countermeasures [J]. Eco-Agriculture Research,1999, 7(4):38-40.[叶旭君,王兆骞,汪成宏,等.台风暴潮对浙东沿海农田生态环境的影响及其对策[J].生态农业研究,1999,7(4):38-40.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备62010202000687
