综述与评述

20122022年地球科学国际发展态势与中国影响力分析

  • 任晓亚 ,
  • 武瑞敏 ,
  • 张志强
展开
  • 1.中国科学院成都文献情报中心, 四川 成都 610299
    2.中国科学院文献情报中心, 北京 100190
    3.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系, 北京 100190
任晓亚,博士后,主要从事科学学与科技政策评价、科学计量学、情报学理论方法与应用等研究. E-mail: renxiaoya@mail.las.ac.cn
张志强,研究员,主要从事科技战略与规划、科技政策与管理等研究. E-mail: zhangzq@clas.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2023-12-18

  修回日期: 2024-01-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金专项项目(L2124022)

Analysis of the International Development Trends and the Chinese Influence on Earth Science in the 2010s

  • Xiaoya REN ,
  • Ruimin WU ,
  • Zhiqiang ZHANG
Expand
  • 1.Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China
    2.National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    3.Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
REN Xiaoya, Postdoctoral researcher, research areas include science of science and scientific and technological policy evaluation, scientometrics, and theoretical methods and applications of information science. E-mail: renxiaoya@mail.las.ac.cn
ZHANG Zhiqiang, Professor, research areas include scientific and technological strategy and planning, scientific and technological policy and management. E-mail: zhangzq@clas.ac.cn

Received date: 2023-12-18

  Revised date: 2024-01-20

  Online published: 2024-03-05

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(L2124022)

摘要

地球科学对一个国家的经济社会发展有着重要的战略支撑作用。为了对国际地球科学发展态势特别是中国地球科学的国际地位与影响力开展多层次分析,通过构建地球科学发展态势“宏观—中观—微观”定量研究框架,从产出规模、合作网络、研究主题、主题热度和国际影响力等多维角度开展基于文献数据的分析。研究发现,2012年以来全球地球科学保持着较为活跃和稳步向前的发展态势,中国在产出规模、发文机构、合作网络、高被引论文以及国际影响力等方面取得长足进步。基于国内外地球科学战略计划与定量研究结论,从学科战略系统规划、国际深度科技合作、国际前沿科学计划主导、学科领域数据中心建设、新技术工具再研发和学科融合创新发展几方面出发,提出未来中国地球科学发展应加大中长期学科战略研究与系统规划、促进高水平国际深度科技合作与交流、策划发起中国领导国际前沿科学计划等。

本文引用格式

任晓亚 , 武瑞敏 , 张志强 . 20122022年地球科学国际发展态势与中国影响力分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024 , 39(2) : 140 -156 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2024.015

Abstract

Earth science is crucial in economic and social development. A quantitative research framework was established to conduct a multi-level analysis of international trends in earth science, focusing on international status and influence of earth science in China. The analysis encompasses macro-, meso-, and micro-level analyses. Based on literature data, this framework analyzes various dimensions such as output scale, collaboration networks, research topics, topic popularity, and international power. Our analysis shows that since 2012, global Earth science has maintained a relatively active and steady development trend. China has made significant progress in output, representative institutions, collaboration networks, highly cited papers, international power, etc. Policy recommendations are proposed for the development of Earth science in China, including strategic planning in the discipline, deep international scientific cooperation, leadership in international frontier scientific programs, the establishment of discipline-specific data centers, redevelopment of new technological tools, interdisciplinary research integration, and the value of economic and social development. These recommendations are based on domestic and international strategic plans and quantitative research findings. Examples include increasing medium- and long-term disciplinary strategic planning, promoting high-level international S & T cooperation, and initiating China’s cutting-edge international scientific programs.

参考文献

1 National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Development strategy of Chinese disciplines in the next 10 years·Earth Sciences[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
1 国家自然科学基金委员会, 中国科学院. 未来10年中国学科发展战略·地球科学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
2 National Science and Technology Council. Science and technology for America’s oceans: a decadal vision[EB/OL]. [2023-09-06]..
3 Australia Geoscience. Geoscience australia strategy 2028[EB/OL]. [2023-09-05]. .
4 World Meteorological Organization. WMO strategic plan 2020-2023[EB/OL].[2022-09-20]. .
5 European Geosciences Union. Declaration of the significance of geoscience expertise to meet global societal challenges[EB/OL]. [2022-09-05]. .
6 National Research Council. A vision for NSF Earth sciences 2020-2030: Earth in time [EB/OL]. [2022-09-05]. .
7 National Center for Atmospheric Research. 2020-2024 NCAR Strategic Plan:Science with and for society[EB/OL].[2022-08-26]..
8 National Centre for Atmospheric Science. Strategy 2020-2025:science we live and breathe[EB/OL].[2022-08-26]. .
9 ECMWF. ECMWF strategy 2021-2030[EB/OL].[2022-08-26]. .
10 IODP. Exploring Earth by scientific ocean drilling 2050 science framwork [EB/OL]. [2022-09-20]. .
11 Report on initiatives, strategies and roadmaps that contribute to foresight in ocean observation[EB/OL].[2022-09-10]..
12 National Science Foundation. Environmental change and human security: research directions[EB/OL].2021.[2023-02-28]. .
13 NOAA. NOAA F Y22-26 strategic plan: building a climate ready nation[EB/OL].[2022-12-26]..
14 ZHU Rixiang, HOU Zengqian, GUO Zhengtang, et al. Summary of “the past, present and future of the habitable Earth: development strategy of Earth science” [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(35): 4 485-4 490.
14 朱日祥, 侯增谦, 郭正堂, 等. 宜居地球的过去、现在与未来——地球科学发展战略概要[J]. 科学通报, 2021, 66(35): 4 485-4 490.
15 自然科学基金委与中国科学院召开学科发展战略研究工作联合领导小组第九次会议[EB/OL]. [2022-11-28]. .
16 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中国概况[EB/OL]. [2023-11-08]. .
17 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 我国研发人员全时当量达 635.4万人年[EB/OL]. [2023-11-08]. .
18 GUAN Peng, WANG Yuefen. Identifying optimal topic numbers from Sci-Tech information with LDA model[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2016(9): 42-50.
18 关鹏, 王曰芬. 科技情报分析中LDA主题模型最优主题数确定方法研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016(9): 42-50.
19 RONG Guoyang, LI Changling, FAN Qingqing, et al. Topic acceleration index: a new method for identifying discipline research hotspots[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65 (20): 59-67.
19 荣国阳, 李长玲, 范晴晴, 等. 主题热度加速度指数——学科研究热点识别新方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65 (20): 59-67.
20 SHAO Jufang, ZHENG Xintian. Analysis of hot articles in the field of international social science research based on basic science indicators database. [J]. China Publishing, 2019(5): 47-49.
20 邵菊芳,郑辛甜. 基本科学指标数据库国际社会科学研究领域热点文章分析 [J]. 中国出版, 2019(5): 47-49.
21 ZHENG Junwei, ZHANG Zhiqiang, ZHAO Jidong. Grand research questions of the Earth sciences for 21 century[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2008, 23(12): 1 260-1 267.
21 郑军卫, 张志强, 赵纪东. 21世纪地球科学研究的重大科学问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(12): 1 260-1 267.
22 ZHANG Zhiqiang. Analysis of the strategic plans of international geosciences, resources, enviroment and ecology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2003, 18(6): 960-973.
22 张志强. 国际地球科学与资源环境科学发展战略分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(6): 960-973.
23 ZHANG Zhiqiang. New achievements and development trends in Earth science research[J]. Exploration of Nature, 1995(2): 23-35.
23 张志强. 地球科学研究的新成就与发展的新走向[J]. 大自然探索, 1995(2): 23-35.
24 ZHANG Zhiqiang. The formation and development of holistic research ideas in Earth science[J]. Science & Technology Review, 1995(7): 11-13.
24 张志强. 地球科学整体性研究思想的形成与发展[J]. 科技导报, 1995(7): 11-13.
文章导航

/