院士论坛

中国人类世科学研究新进展

  • 周卫健 ,
  • 赵雪 ,
  • 陈宁
展开
  • 1.中国科学院地球环境研究所 黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,陕西 西安 710061
    2.陕西省 加速器质谱技术及应用重点实验室,西安加速器质谱中心,陕西 西安 710061
    3.西安地球 环境创新研究院,陕西 西安 710061
    4.西安交通大学,陕西 西安 710049
周卫健,研究员,中国科学院院士,主要从事宇宙成因核素的环境示踪与全球变化研究. E-mail:weijian@loess.llqg.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2023-10-17

  修回日期: 2023-12-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-17

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41991250);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB40010100)

New Progress in the Anthropocene Science in China

  • Weijian ZHOU ,
  • Xue ZHAO ,
  • Ning CHEN
Expand
  • 1.State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China
    2.Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China
    3.Xi’an Institute for Innovative Earth Environment Research, Xi’an 710061, China
    4.Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
ZHOU Weijian, Professor, Academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, research areas include environmental tracing by cosmogenic nuclides and global change. E-mail: weijian@loess.llqg.ac.cn

Received date: 2023-10-17

  Revised date: 2023-12-24

  Online published: 2024-01-17

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41991250);The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDB40010100)

摘要

国际地层委员会人类世工作组决议人类世应由全球界线层型剖面和点位(“金钉子”)定义为一个正式的地质年代单位。20世纪中叶以来人类活动突变式增强,改变了原有的地球演化速率和方向,对地球环境造成极为显著的影响,并在地质记录中留下清晰的具有全球同步特性的物理、化学和生物印记,为识别这一年代地层单位的底界提供了最佳选择。当前,全球共有12个人类世“金钉子”候选剖面和点位参评。与此同时,中国学者在人类活动代用指标体系构建、人类世候选“金钉子”研究与国际对比方面取得了突出进展,发现人工放射性核素、微塑料、δ13C、δ15N和硅藻等均可作为人类活动理想的标志物,且远离城市和人类活动影响的中国四海龙湾玛珥湖沉积物剖面对全球信号敏感,239,240Pu浓度于1953年快速增加,多环芳烃、129I、烟炱14C、碳球粒、DNA、δ13C和重金属等指标在1953年前后均存在系统性变化,因此提出1953年作为人类世底界。中国四海龙湾湖沉积物剖面与日本别府海湾沉积物剖面被人类世工作组提议作为人类世“金钉子”辅助剖面。未来人类世科学研究的最终目标应是在阐明人类活动对地球系统影响的基础上,深化人地系统耦合与适应的可持续发展理论和技术创新。

本文引用格式

周卫健 , 赵雪 , 陈宁 . 中国人类世科学研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024 , 39(1) : 1 -11 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2024.008

Abstract

The Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy voted that the Anthropocene should be defined by a Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP or ‘golden spike’) as a formal chronostratigraphic unit. Increasing evidence has shown that human activities have drastically intensified since the mid-twentieth century, altering the original rate and direction of Earth’s evolution, triggering a profound impact on Earth’s environment, and leaving their imprint on geological records through physical, chemical, and biological markers. Consequently, the 1950s was assumed to be the ideal onset of the Anthropocene. Currently, 12 candidate sites for the GSSP of the Anthropocene have been proposed for consideration by the AWG. Chinese researchers have made outstanding progress in recent years regarding the establishment of a system of proxies for human activities and the global comparison of the candidate sites for the GSSP of the Anthropocene. These proxies, including anthropogenic radioactive isotopes, microplastics, δ13C, δ15N, and diatoms, have great potential as markers of human activities. These proxies recorded in the sediments of Sihailongwan Maar Lake, which is far away from cities and less affected by human activities, indicate that this site is sensitive to global change. The concentrations of 239, 240Pu have drastically increased since 1953 CE in the sediment profile collected from Sihailongwan Maar Lake. as Additionally, other proxies such as PAHs, 129I, soot 14C, SCP (spheroidal carbonaceous particles), DNA, δ13C, and Pb exhibit synchronous changes near 1953 CE, indicating the onset of Anthropocene. Two sediment stratotype profiles collected from Sihailongwan Maar Lake and Beppu Bay, Japan, were selected by the AWG as auxiliary sections for the GSSP of the Anthropocene. The ultimate goal of Anthropocene science should be to deepen the theory and technological innovation of sustainable development of the Earth-humans system and adaptation based on clarifying the impact of human activities on the Earth system.

参考文献

1 CRUTZEN P J, STOERMER E F. The “Anthropocene” [J]. IGBP News Letter, 2000, 41: 17-18.
2 CRUTZEN P J. Geology of mankind[J]. Nature, 2002, 415(6 867). DOI:10.1038/415023a .
3 ZALASIEWICZ J, WILLIAMS M, SMITH A, et al. Are we now living in the Anthropocene?[J]. GSA Today, 2008, 18: 4-8.
4 ZALASIEWICZ J, WILLIAMS M, STEFFEN W, et al. The new world of the Anthropocene [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 44: 2 228-2 231.
5 ZALASIEWICZ J, WATERS C N, SUMMERHAYES C P, et al. The working group on the Anthropocene: summary of evidence and interim recommendations [J]. Anthropocene, 2017, 19: 55-60.
6 AWG. Results of binding vote by AWG released on 21st May 2019 [C/OL]. 2019. [2023-12-20]. .
7 SUBRAMANIAN M. Humans versus Earth: the quest to define the Anthropocene [J]. Nature, 2019, 572: 168-170.
8 KETTERER M E, HAFER K M, JONES V J, et al. Rapid dating of recent sediments in Loch Ness: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric measurements of global fallout plutonium[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2004, 322(1/2/3): 221-229.
9 KUDO A, ZHENG J, KOERNER R M, et al. Global transport rates of 137Cs and 239+240Pu originating from the Nagasaki A-bomb in 1945 as determined from analysis of Canadian Arctic ice cores[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 1998, 40(3): 289-298.
10 SU Y, HU X, TANG H J, et al. Steam disinfection releases micro(nano)plastics from silicone-rubber baby teats as examined by optical photothermal infrared microspectroscopy[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2022, 17(1): 76-85.
11 FIA?KIEWICZ-KOZIE? B, SMIEJA-KRóL B, FRONTASYEVA M, et al. Anthropogenic- and natural sources of dust in peatland during the Anthropocene[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1). DOI: 10.1038/srep38731 .
12 ZALASIEWICZ J, WATERS C N, WOLFE A P, et al. Making the case for a formal Anthropocene Epoch: an analysis of ongoing critiques[J]. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 2017, 50(2): 205-226.
13 WATERS C N, ZALASIEWICZ J, SUMMERHAYES C, et al. Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Anthropocene series: where and how to look for potential candidates[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 178: 379-429.
14 WATERS C N, TURNER S D, ZALASIEWICZ J, et al. Candidate sites and other reference sections for the Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point of the Anthropocene series [J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, 10(1): 3-24.
15 MCCARTHY F M, PATTERSON R T, HEAD M J, et al. The varved succession of Crawford Lake, Milton, Ontario, Canada as a candidate Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Anthropocene series [J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, 10(1): 146-176.
16 WITZE A. This quiet lake could mark the start of a new Anthropocene epoch [J]. Nature, 2023, 619: 441-442.
17 GIBBARD P L, BAUER A M, EDGEWORTH M, et al. A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event, not a formal epoch [J]. Episodes, 2022, 45(4): 349-357.
18 RUDDIMAN W F. The early anthropogenic hypothesis: challenges and responses [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2007, 45(3).DOI: 10.1029/2006RG000207 .
19 FINNEY S C, EDWARDS L E. The “Anthropocene” epoch: scientific decision or political statement?[J]. GSA Today, 2016, 26(3/4): 4-10.
20 HEAD M J, ZALASIEWICZ J A, WATERS C N, et al. The proposed Anthropocene Epoch/Series is underpinned by an extensive array of mid-20th century stratigraphic event signals [J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2022, 37(7): 1 181-1 187.
21 STEFFEN W, ROCKSTR?M J, RICHARDSON K, et al. Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene [J]. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(33): 8 252-8 259.
22 WATERS C N, ZALASIEWICZ J, SUMMERHAYES C, et al. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene [J]. Science,2016, 351. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad2622 .
23 ZHANG Zhiqiang. The new word of the Anthropocene [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 25(9): 997-1 000.
23 张志强.新的地质时期———人类世[J].地球科学进展,2010, 25(9):997-1 000.
24 LEWIS S L, MASLIN M A. Defining the Anthropocene [J]. Nature, 2015, 519: 171-180.
25 ELLIS E C. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2011, 369(1 938): 1 010-1 035.
26 RUDDIMAN W F. The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago[J]. Climatic Change, 2003, 61(3): 261-293.
27 BROECHER W C, STOCKER T F. The Holocene CO2 rise: Anthropogenic or natural?[J]. Eos,Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2006, 87(3): 27. DOI:10.1029/2006EO030002 .
28 STOCKER B D, STRASSMANN K, JOOS F. Sensitivity of Holocene atmospheric CO2 and the modern carbon budget to early human land use: analyses with a process-based model[J]. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8(1): 69-88.
29 LIU Xue, ZHANG Zhiqiang, ZHENG Junwei, et al. Discussion on the anthropocene research[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(5): 640-649.
29 刘学, 张志强, 郑军卫, 等. 关于人类世问题研究的讨论[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(5): 640-649.
30 IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the methodological assessment of scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services [M]. Bonn: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2016.
31 FARNSWORTH A, EUNICE LO Y T, VALDES P J, et al. Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercontinent assembly[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16(10): 901-908.
32 RUDDIMAN W F, THOMSON J S. The case for human causes of increased atmospheric CH4 over the last 5000 years[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2001, 20(18): 1 769-1 777.
33 RUDDIMAN W F, GUO Z T, ZHOU X, et al. Early rice farming and anomalous methane trends[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2008, 27(13/14): 1 291-1 295.
34 RUDDIMAN W F. The anthropocene[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2013, 41: 45-68.
35 ZALASIEWICZ J, WATERS C N, WILLIAMS M, et al. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal[J]. Quaternary International, 2015, 383: 196-203.
36 STEFFEN W, BROADGATE W, DEUTSCH L, et al. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration [J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2015, 2(1): 81-98.
37 MATSUGUMA Y, TAKADA H, KUMATA H, et al. Microplastics in sediment cores from Asia and Africa as indicators of temporal trends in plastic pollution[J]. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2017, 73(2): 230-239.
38 ZALASIEWICZ J, WATERS C N, IVAR DO SUL J A, et al. The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene[J]. Anthropocene, 2016, 13: 4-17.
39 HOLTGRIEVE G W, SCHINDLER D E, HOBBS W O, et al. A coherent signature of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to remote watersheds of the Northern Hemisphere[J]. Science, 2011, 334(6 062): 1 545-1 548.
40 HASTINGS M G, JARVIS J C, STEIG E J. Anthropogenic impacts on nitrogen isotopes of ice-core nitrate[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5 932). DOI: 10.1126/science.1170510 .
41 WYNN P M, LOADER N J, FAIRCHILD I J. Interrogating trees for isotopic archives of atmospheric sulphur deposition and comparison to speleothem records[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 187: 98-105.
42 WALKER M, JOHNSEN S, RASMUSSEN S O, et al. Formal definition and dating of the GSSP (Global Stratotype Section and Point) for the base of the Holocene using the Greenland NGRIP ice core, and selected auxiliary records[J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2009, 24: 3-17.
43 SHAKUN J D, CLARK P U, HE F, et al. Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation[J]. Nature, 2012, 484: 49-54.
44 MARCOTT S A, SHAKUN J D, CLARK P U, et al. A reconstruction of regional and global temperature for the past 11,300 years[J]. Science, 2013, 339: 1 198-1 201.
45 MONNIN E, INDERMUHLE A, DALLENBACH A, et al. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the last glacial termination[J]. Science, 2001, 291: 112-114.
46 MACFARLING M C, ETHERIDGE D, TRUDINGER C, et al. Law Dome CO2, CH4 and N2O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33. DOI: 10.1029/2006GL026152 .
47 ETHERIDGE D M, STEELE L P, FRANCEY R J, et al. Atmospheric methane between 1000 AD and present: evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability[J]. Journal Geophysical Research, 1998, 103: 15 979-15 993.
48 ALEXANDER L V, ALLEN S, BINDOFF N L, et al. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis[M]// Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
49 LANGENFELDS R L, STEELE L P, LEIST M A, et al. Atmospheric methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and nitrous oxide from Cape Grim flask air samples analysed by gas chromatography, baseline 2007-2008[M]. Melbourne:Australian Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, 2011: 62-66.
50 CIAIS P, SABINE C, BALA G, et al. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles[M]// STOCKER T F, QIN D, PLATTNER G K. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013: 465-544.
51 BOPP L, RESPLANDY L, ORR J C, et al. Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10: 6 225-6 245.
52 History Database of the Global Environment (2013) Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. HYDE[EB/OL].(2023-12-15)[2023-12-18]. .
53 SCHMIED H M, CACERES D, EISNER S, et al. The global water resources and use model Water GAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2021, 14(2): 1 037-1 079.
54 WATERS C N, WILLIAMS M, ZALASIEWICZ J, et al. Epochs, events and episodes: marking the geological impact of humans[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 234. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104171 .
55 ROSOL C, SCH?FER G N, TURNER S D, et al. Evidence and experiment: curating contexts of Anthropocene geology[J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, 10(1): 330-339.
56 LU Cairong, WANG Guangrong. What are the academicians paying attention to—the latest information from Chinese research frontier [J]. Policy & Management, 2004, 11(6): 26-28.
56 陆彩荣,王光荣.院士们在关注什么——来自中国科研前沿的最新信息[J].科学咨询(决策管理),2004, 11(6): 26-28.
57 LIU Dongsheng. Demand of Anthropocene study in the new stage of geoscience: in honor of late geologist Huang Jiqing for his innovative spirit[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2004, 24(4): 369-378.
57 刘东生. 开展“人类世”环境研究,做新时代地学的开拓者——纪念黄汲清先生的地学创新精神[J]. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24(4): 369-378.
58 WANG Pinxian, TIAN Jun, HUANG Enqing, et al. Earth system and evolution[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018: 446-450.
58 汪品先,田军,黄恩清,等. 地球系统与演变[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2018: 446-450.
59 LIAO H Q, BU W T, ZHENG J, et al. Vertical distributions of radionuclides (239+240Pu, 240Pu/239Pu, and 137Cs) in sediment cores of Lake Bosten in northwestern China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(7): 3 840-3 846.
60 WU F C, ZHENG J, LIAO H Q, et al. Vertical distributions of plutonium and 137Cs in lacustrine sediments in northwestern China: quantifying sediment accumulation rates and source identifications[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(8): 2 911-2 917.
61 ZHAO X, HOU X L, DU J Z, et al. Anthropogenic 129I in the sediment cores in the East China Sea: sources and transport pathways[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 245: 443-452.
62 ZHAO X, HOU X L, ZHANG D L, et al. Records of iodine isotopes (129I, 127I) in the Barkol peat bog from northwest China and their sources, transport and preservation[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 279. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130531 .
63 TONG X N, HU J F, XI D P, et al. Depositional environment of the Late Santonian lacustrine source rocks in the Songliao Basin (NE China): implications from organic geochemical analyses[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2018, 124: 215-227.
64 HU J F, ZHOU H D, PENG P A, et al. Reconstruction of a paleotemperature record from 0.3-3.7 ka for subtropical South China using lacustrine branched GDGTs from Huguangyan Maar[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2015, 435: 167-176.
65 YAN M T, CHEN X F, CHU W, et al. Microplastic pollution and enrichment of distinct microbiota in sediment of mangrove in Zhujiang River Estuary, China[J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2023, 41(1): 215-228.
66 WU Y H, WANG S M, XIA W L, et al. Dating recent lake sediments using Spheroidal Carbonaceous Particle (SCP)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2005, 50(10): 1 016-1 020.
67 DONG M T, CHEN W, CHEN X, et al. Geochemical markers of the Anthropocene: perspectives from temporal trends in pollutants [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142987 .
68 ZHANG P Z, WANG X B, CHEN J F, et al. δ13C values and hydrogen index records in sediment organic matter of RH core of Zoig Basin,eastern Qing-Zang (Tibet) Plateau and their environmental significance [J]. Science China Chemistry, 1995, 8: 1 015-1 024.
69 LANG Yunchao, LIU Congqiang, ZHAO Zhiqi. A review of studies on sources and migration of various contaminants in surface and ground waters by using boron and its isotopes[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2002, 9(4): 409-415.
69 郎赟超, 刘丛强, 赵志琦. 硼及其同位素对水体污染物的示踪研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(4): 409-415.
70 CHEN X, MCGOWAN S, ZENG L H, et al. Changes in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a floodplain lake over recent decades linked to littoral expansion, declining riverine influx, and eutrophication[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2017, 31(17): 3 110-3 121.
71 HAN Y M, WEI C, HUANG R J, et al. Reconstruction of atmospheric soot history in inland regions from lake sediments over the past 150 years[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1). DOI: 10.1038/srep19151 .
72 NI H Y, HAN Y M, CAO J J, et al. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 123: 399-406.
73 HAN Y M, AN Z S, ARIMOTO R, et al. Sediment soot radiocarbon indicates that recent pollution controls slowed fossil fuel emissions in southeastern China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(3): 1 534-1 543.
74 LIU C C, YAN H, WANG G Z, et al. Species specific Sr/Ca-δ18O relationships for three Tridacnidae species from the northern South China Sea[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 584. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120519 .
75 YAN H, SHAO D, WANG Y H, et al. Sr/Ca profile of long-lived Tridacna gigas bivalves from South China Sea: a new high-resolution SST proxy[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, 112: 52-65.
76 CHENG Z J, WENG C Y, STEINKE S, et al. Anthropogenic modification of vegetated landscapes in Southern China from 6, 000 years ago[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2018, 11(12): 939-943.
77 HUANG X Z, ZHANG J, REN L L, et al. Intensification and driving forces of pastoralism in Northern China 5.7 ka ago [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(7). DOI: 10.1029/2020GL092288 .
78 CHEN X, YANG X D, DONG X H, et al. Nutrient dynamics linked to hydrological condition and anthropogenic nutrient loading in Chaohu Lake (southeast China)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2011, 661: 223-234.
79 YANG X D, ANDERSON N J, DONG X H, et al. Surface sediment diatom assemblages and epilimnetic total phosphorus in large, shallow lakes of the Yangtze floodplain: their relationships and implications for assessing long-term eutrophication[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2008, 53: 1 273-1 290.
80 ZHANG K, YANG X D, XU M, et al. Confronting challenges of managing degraded lake ecosystems in the Anthropocene, exemplified from the Yangtze River Basin in China[J]. Anthropocene, 2018, 24: 30-39.
81 HUO S L, ZHANG H X, MONCHAMP M E, et al. Century-long homogenization of algal communities is accelerated by nutrient enrichment and climate warming in lakes and reservoirs of the north temperate zone[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(6): 3 780-3 790.
82 HAN Y M, AN Z S, LEI D W, et al. The Sihailongwan maar Lake, northeastern China as a candidate Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Anthropocene Series[J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, 10(1): 177-200.
83 FROEHLICH M B, CHAN W Y, TIMS S G, et al. Time-resolved record of 236U and 239,240Pu isotopes from a coral growing during the nuclear testing program at Enewetak Atoll (Marshall Islands)[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2016, 165: 197-205.
84 HAN Y M, MCNEILL J R, ROSE N L, et al. Combustion products as markers for the Anthropocene [M]. Berlin: HKW, 2022.
85 ZHAO Jianbo, Yi JIE. On several basic theoretical questions of geology of Anthropocene[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 42(4): 649-653.
85 赵剑波, 揭毅. 人类世地质学几个基本理论问题[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 42(4): 649-653.
文章导航

/