地震中长期预测研究的进展和方向

张秋文,张培震

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.02.0147

地球科学进展 >

1999 , Vol. 14 >Issue 2: 147 - 152

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.02.0147

综述与评述

地震中长期预测研究的进展和方向

展开

中国地震局地质研究所,北京　100029

张秋文,男,1968年7月生,助理研究员,研究方向为地震地质、水库诱发地震和GIS应用等。

收稿日期: 1998-06-22

修回日期: 1998-09-15

网络出版日期: 1999-04-01

基金资助

中国地震局“九五”重点项目“重点监视防御区地震危险性定量评估方法与震级上限的确定原则”(95-04-10-07)部分成果。

收起

PROGRESS AND PROSPECT IN THE STUDIES ON LONG AND MEDIUM-TERM EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION

Expand

Institute ofGeology,Seismological Bureau ofChina,Beijing　100029,China

Received date: 1998-06-22

Revised date: 1998-09-15

Online published: 1999-04-01

Fold

摘要

综述了地震中长期预测的研究历史和发展现状、存在问题及发展方向。地震中长期预测研究大体可以划分为确定性预测研究和概率性预测研究两个主要发展阶段。已有的预测模型和方法在地震复发模式、不确定性分析、断裂之间的相互作用、单一学科面临的资料缺乏等方面存在许多问题。今后一个时期内,地震中长期预测研究的主要发展方向为:建立地震复发模式、建立大陆板内地震复发间隔的通用概率分布模型、活动断裂定量研究资料的应用、不确定性分析、断裂之间的相互作用及其对地震危险性分析的影响以及多学科、多手段的综合运用等。

关键词： 地震中长期预测; 地震复发模式; 断裂之间的相互作用; 不确定性分析; 活动断裂定量研究

本文引用格式

张秋文,张培震 . 地震中长期预测研究的进展和方向[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999 , 14(2) : 147 -152 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.02.0147

Abstract

The progress, problem and prospect of long and medium-term earthquake prediction research are outlined. The research history can be divided into two stages: definitive prediction and probability prediction. There are many problems in the existing models and methods such as earthquake recurrence model, analysis of non-definition, interaction between faults and short of information. So, in the future, the main research fields of long and medium-term earthquake prediction are as follows:①Establish earthquake recurrence model,②Establish a generic recurrence interval distribution model appropriate for intraplate earthquake,③Application of the quantitative research date of active fault,④Analysis of non-definition,⑤Interaction between faults and its effects, and⑥Application of multidisciplinary approach.

Key words： Long and medium-term earthquake prediction; Earthquake recurrence model; Interaction between faults; Quantitative research of active fault.

参考文献

〔1〕Cornell C A. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am,1968,58: 1 583~1 606.
〔2〕Shimazaki K, Nakata T. Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett, 1980, 7: 279~282.
〔3〕Schwartz DP, Copperss. Fault behavior and characteristic earthquake:examples from the Wasatch and San Andress fault zones. J Geophys Res, 1984, 89: 5 681~5 698.
〔4〕Nishenko S P, Buland R. Ageneric recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bull SeismSoc Am, 1987, 77:1 382~1 399.
〔5〕Wayne Thatcher. Order and diversity in the models of circum-Pacific earthquake recurrence. J Geophys Res, 1990, 95: 2 609~2 623.
〔6〕Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D. Seismic gap hypothesis: ten years after. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96: 21 419~21 431.
〔7〕Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D. Long-term earthquake clustering. Geophys J Int, 1991b, 104: 117~133.
〔8〕闻学泽.活断层的定量研究与长期地震潜势的概率估计问题.活动断裂研究(1).北京:地震出版社,1991.
〔9〕闻学泽.活动断裂地震潜势的定量评价.北京:地震出版社,1995.
〔10〕闻学泽,张培震.地震的原地复发模式理论及其有关问题.活动断裂研究(5).北京:地震出版社,1996.
〔11〕Wesnousky S G. Earthquake, Quaterary faults and Seismic hazard in California. J Geophys Res, 1986, 91: 12 587~12 631.
〔12〕Working Group on California Earthquake Probability. Probabilities of large earthquake occurring in California on San Andress fault. U S Geological Survey Open-File Report ,1988. 88~398.
〔13〕Working Group on California Earthquake Probability. Probabilities of large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay region, California. U S Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1990. 88~398.
〔14〕张培震,毛风英.活动断裂定量研究与中长期强地震危险性概率评价.活动断裂研究(5).北京:地震出版社,1996.
〔15〕Goes D B. Irregular recurrence of large earthquakes: An analysis of historic and paleoseismic catalogs. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 5 739~5 749.
〔16〕Ward S N. A synthetic seismicity model for Southern California: cycles, probabilities and hazard .JGeophysRes, 1996, 101: 22 393~22 418.
〔17〕Cornell C A, Shen-Chyn Wu, Wimters-tein S R,et al. Seismic hazard induced by mechanically interactive fault segments. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1993, 83: 436~449.
〔18〕Ward SN. Amultidisciplinary approachto seismic hazard in Southern California.Bull Seism Soc Am, 1994, 84: 1 293~1 309.
〔19〕Anderson J G. Estimating the seismicity from geological structure for seismic risk studies. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1979, 69: 135~198.
〔20〕Molar P. Earthquake recurrence intervals and plate tectonics. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1979, 69: 115~134.
〔21〕Goes D B. Synthetic seismicity for the San Andress fault. Ann Geofis, 1994, 37: 1 495~1 511.
〔22〕Ward S N. Synthetic seismicity model for the Middle America Trench. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96:19 800~19 810.
〔23〕Allen C R. Geological criteria for evaluating seismicity. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1975, 86: 1 041~1 057.
〔24〕Slemmons D B, Bodin P, Zhang X. Determination of earthquake size from surface faulting events. Proceedings of International Seminar on seismic zonation. Guanzhou, China,1987.
〔25〕邓起东.活动断裂研究的进展与方向.活动断裂研究(1).北京:地震出版社,1991.
〔26〕Wallace R E. Earthquake intervals on the San Andress fault. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1970, 81: 2 875~2 890.
〔27〕Carlson JM. Time intervalsbetween characteristic earthquake and corelations with smaller events: an analysis based on a mechanical model of a fault. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96: 4 255~4 267.
〔28〕ReasenbegPA, Simpson RW. Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake. Science, 1992, 255: 1 687~1 690.
〔29〕Rundle HF. A physical model for earthquake fluctuations and interactions. J Geophys Res, 1988, 93: 6 237~6 254.
〔30〕李安然.地震孕育区的总体构造环境与构造—地球物理学.中国地震年鉴(1989).北京:地震出版社,1991.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献