收稿日期: 2009-04-28
修回日期: 2009-05-11
网络出版日期: 2009-06-10
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全”(编号:2009CB421100)资助.
The Main Terrestrial Ecosystem Services and Ecological Security in China
Received date: 2009-04-28
Revised date: 2009-05-11
Online published: 2009-06-10
生态系统服务是国际生态学研究的前沿和热点,表现出向生态系统服务机理和区域集成方法两大方向发展的趋势。开展陆地生态系统服务研究,是生态系统恢复、生态功能区划和建立生态补偿机制、保障国家生态安全的重大战略需求。面向国家重大需求和生态系统服务研究的国际前沿,以主要陆地生态系统为对象,“中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全”项目拟解决3个科学问题:①生态系统结构—过程—服务功能的相互作用机理;②生态系统服务功能的尺度特征与多尺度关联;③生态系统服务功能评估的指标与模型。通过上述研究,发展生态系统服务研究的理论与方法,为国家的生态建设和环境保护提供科学支撑。
傅伯杰 , 周国逸 , 白永飞 , 宋长春 , 刘纪远 , 张惠远 , 吕一河 , 郑华 , 谢高地 . 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009 , 24(6) : 571 -576 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2009.06.0571
Ecosystem service has become a hot topic in international ecological research with two major trends of advancing ecosystem service mechanism and regional integration methodologies. At the same time, terrestrial ecosystem service research is a great national science and strategic need for ecological restoration, ecological functional regionalization, ecological compensation, and sustaining ecological security. Targeting this necessity and the international research frontiers of ecosystem service, this project takes main terrestrial ecosystems in China as the object of research. There are three scientific themes that will be tackled: ①the interaction between ecosystem structure, process and services; ②spatiotemporal coupling and scale effects of ecosystem service; ③regional ecosystem service assessment and integration modeling. Through the above, it is managed to promote the development of ecosystem service theory and applications to scientifically support national ecological rehabilitation and environmental protection.
Key words: Ecosystem service; Ecosystem process; Ecological security; Scaling
[1] Daily G C, ed. Nature′s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems\[M\]. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
[2] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
[3] Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H. The value of biodiversity[J].Ambio,1992, 21: 219-226.
[4] Constanza R, d′Arge R, de Groot R,et al. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997, 387: 253-260.
[5] Le Maitre D C, Milton S J, Jarmain C,et al. Linking ecosystem services and water resources: Landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2007,5(5): 261-270.
[6] Palmer M A, Morse J, Bernhardt E, et al. Ecology for a crowded planet[J].Science,2004,304:1 251-1 252.
[7] Sutherland W J, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth P R, et al.The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,43: 617-627.
[8] Daily G C, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, et al. Ecology: The value of nature and the nature of value[J].Science,2000, 289:395-396.
[9] Heal G. Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services[M]. Covelo, California: Island Press, 2000.
[10] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment[M].Washington DC:Island Press, 2003.
[11] Biggs R, Bohensky E, Desanker P V,et al. Nature Supporting People: The South African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[R].Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa,2004.
[12] Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology?[J].Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 468-479.
[13] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al. Human domination of Earth′s ecosystem[J].Science,1997, 277:494-499.
[14] National Research Council. Watershed Management for Potable Water Supply: Assessing the New York City Strategy[M]. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
[15] Balmford A, Green R E, Jenkins M. Measuring the changing state of nature[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2003, 18:326-330.
[16] Luck G W, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R. Population diversity and ecosystem service[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2003, 18:331-336.
[17] Robertson G P, Swinton S M. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture[J].Frontier in Ecology and Environment, 2005, 3:38-46.
[18] Armsworth P R, Chan K M A, Daily G C, et al. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation[J].Conservation Biology,2007, 21(6):1 383-1 384.
[19] Holmes T P, Bergstrom J C, Huszar E,et al. Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration[J].Ecological Economics,2004, 49: 19-30.
[20] Swift M J, Izac A M N, Noordwijk M Van. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes-are we asking the right questions?[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2004, 104: 113-134.
[21] Yue T X, Liu J Y, Li Z Q, et al. Considerable effects of diversity indices and spatial scales on conclusions relating to ecological diversity[J].Ecological Modelling,2005, 188: 418-431.
[22] Houlahan J E, Findlay C S. Estimating the critical distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality[J].Landscape Ecology,2004, 19:677-690.
[23] Fu Bojie,Lü Yihe,Chen Liding,et al. The latest progress of landscape ecology in the world[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(2):798-804.[傅伯杰,吕一河,陈利顶,等.国际景观生态学研究新进展[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(2):798-804.]
[24] Peterson D L, Parker V T. Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,1998:5-16.
[25] Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N, et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services[J].Ecology Letters,2006, 9:1 146-1 156.
[26] Worm B, Barbier E B, Beaumout N, et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services[J]. Science,2006, 314(787):787-790.
[27] Mertz O, Ravnborg H M, Lövei G L, et al. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries[J]. Biodiversity Conservation,2007,16:2 729-2 737.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |