地球科学进展 ›› 1999, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 269 -273. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.03.0269

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

晚古生代中国大陆与欧美地区植物群之间的差异及其原因
刘化清 1,袁剑英 1,苏 醒 1,完颜容 1,魏东涛 1,沈光隆 2   
  1. 1.中国石油天然气集团公司西北地质研究所,甘肃 兰州 730020;2.西北大学地质系,陕西 西安 710069
  • 收稿日期:1998-10-16 修回日期:1998-12-03 出版日期:1999-06-01
  • 通讯作者: 刘化清,男,1969年8月出生,工程师,从事古生物学及地层学方面的研究工作。

DIFFERENCES AND THEIR POSSIBLE REASONS BETWEEN CHINESE AND EUROAMERICAN FLORAS IN LATE PALAEOZOIC

LIU Huaqing 1,YUAN Jianying 1,SU Xing 1,WAN Yanrong 1,WEI Dongtao, 1SHEN Guanglong 2   

  1. 1.Northwest Geology Research Institute,CNPC,Lanzhou730020,China;2.Department of Geology,Northwest University,Xi an710060,China
  • Received:1998-10-16 Revised:1998-12-03 Online:1999-06-01 Published:1999-06-01

晚古生代同处于赤道或低纬度地带的中国大陆植物群与欧美地区同期植物群之间总存在一定的差异。中泥盆世—早石炭世维宪期,中国大陆以石松类的大量繁育和高度分异为显著特色,而同期的欧美地区植物群以古蕨类和前裸子植物为其主体;纳缪尔期—二叠纪,大量东亚型鳞木类植物及许多地方性植物属相继在中国大陆出现,使它和欧美植物群之间的差距进一步拉大。造成两地植物组分差异的主要原因可能与当时气候的经向变化有关(主要是两地距离古特提斯洋远近不同,从而导致湿度有别)。

Differences are obviously existed between the Chinese and Euroamerican floras in the late Palaeozoic.The Chinese middle-late Devonian floras were mainly occupied by the primitive lepidophytes includingLepidodendropsis,Protolepidodendron,Lepidosigillaria,SublepidodendronandLeptophloeum. In contrast,the synchronous Euroamerican floras were dominated by ferns and progymnosperms,the common members of which are Hyenia,Reimannia,Rellimia,Archaeopteris,RhacophytonandAneurophyton.While primitive lepidophytes were relatively rare.In Tournaisian-Visean,the Chinese floras were characterized by flourishing of the lepidophytes.Besides some primitive elements such asLepidodendron volkmannianumandLepidodendron Lossenii,a few oriental type species with relatively large leaf scars (i.e.Lepidodendron ninghsiaense,Bothrodendron ruchengenseandBothrodendron criculare)also appeared.In addition,the so-called Euroamerican Westphanian Flora members ofParipteris,LinopterisandEusphenopterishave been found in the Chouniukou Formation of North Qilian Mountains.However,both the Tournaisian and the Visean floras in the Euroamerican massland were dominated by the primitive ferns with radiate venation,the most common elements areAdiantites,Anisiopteris,FryopsisandSpathulopteris.
According to the above mentioned,“Procathaysian Flora”is suggested to represent the Chinese middle Devonian-Visean floras in this paper.
From Namurian to Permian,many typical oriental type lepidophytes(includingLepidodendron ninghsiaense,Lepidodendron oculus-felis,Lepidodendron posthumiiandCathaysiodendron nanpiaoense)and some endemic genera(Tingia,Conchophyllum,Gigantoperis,Emplectopteris,Lobatannularis)appeared one after another on the Chinese Composite Continents,suggesting that the gap between the Chinese and the Euroamerican floras enlarged and the famous Cathaysian Flora occured in this time.
The present authors believe to a great extent that it was the east-west climatic differentiation(mainly the change of humidity)that caused the differences between the two floras.Since the Caledonian orogeny at the end of Silurian,the North American plate,the European plate and the Gondwana continent collided in succession,and thus resulted in continuous growth of the united continent(Pangea).In this case ,the equatorial current and the trade wind of the ancient Tethys ocean had fewer and fewer effect on the hinterland and dry continental climate strengthened there.As a response,the mesophilous plants(ferns)were extremely prosperous.On the contrary,the Cathaysian continent was constituted by certain water surrounded small islands in the overwhelming majority of late Palaeozoic,so the humid maritime climate developped and the lepidophytes lushed.

中图分类号: 

〔1〕蔡重阳,欧阳舒,王怿.志留纪植物群.见:李星学主编.中国地质时期植物群.济南:山东科技出版社,1995.3~21.
〔2〕蔡重阳,王怿.泥盆纪植物群.见:李星学主编.中国地质时期植物群.济南:山东科技出版社,1995.22~57.
〔3〕李星学,吴秀元,沈光隆,等.北祁连东段纳缪尔期地层和古生物.济南:山东科技出版社,1993.
〔4〕江新胜,潘桂棠,李兴振.晚古生代特提斯区热带、亚热带植物群的东西分异.岩相古地理,1996,16(2):34~41.
〔5〕Darrah W C.A critical review of the upper pennsylvanian floras of eastern United States with notes on the Mazon creek flora of Illinors.Privately Printed,Gttysburg, 1969.40~64.
〔6〕Chaloner W G,Meyen S V.Carboniferous and permian floras of the northern continents.In:Hallam A,ed.Atlas of palaeo-biogeography. Amsterdam, London, New york: Els Sci Publ Comp,1973.169~186.
〔7〕刘本培.地史学教程.北京:地质出版社,1986.273~274.
〔8〕梅因著.古植物学基础.姚兆奇,张志诚译.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988.
〔9〕Walter H,Breckle S W.Ecological systems of the geobiosphere 1, Ecological principles in global perpective. Translated by Gruber S.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1985.15~40.
〔10〕孙革.论中国晚三叠世植物地理分区及古植物分区原则.地质学报,1987,61(1):1~9.
〔11〕林金录.石炭纪末的古地理.地震地质,1987,9(2):91~94.

 

[1] 尹殿奎,刘欢,孙跃武,万传彪,赵俊丽. 吉林延边地区下白垩统长财组铁角蕨属一新种[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(12): 1285-1292.
[2] 李明涛,孙柏年,肖良,任文秀,李相传,戴静. 浙东中新世 Betula mioluminifera Hu et Chaney 的发现及古气候重建[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(6): 651-658.
[3] 郝守刚,王德明. 中国云南早泥盆世坡松冲植物群——探究早期陆生维管植物演化分异的窗口[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(6): 877-883.
阅读次数
全文


摘要