地球科学进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 715 -723. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.06.0715

新学科·新发展·新技术 上一篇    下一篇

层次分析法在致密油有利区优选中的应用——以川中侏罗系大安寨段为例
汪少勇, 李建忠, 郭秋麟, 李登华   
  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 出版日期:2015-06-25
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”(编号:2011ZX05028); 中国石油天然气集团公司重大专项“油气资源评价——中国石油第四次油气资源评价”(编号:2013E-0502)资助

Application of AHP Method to Favorable Area Optimization for Tight Oil:A Case Study in Daanzhai Formation, Jurassic, Central of the Sichuan Basin

Wang Shaoyong, Li Jianzhong, Guo Qiulin, Li Denghua   

  1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China
  • Online:2015-06-25 Published:2015-06-25

层次分析法常用于解决复杂系统分析与决策中目标优选、排序等问题,也适用于油气勘探领域。在前人致密油地质特征研究的基础上,总结了致密油有利区优选指标。使用层次分析法优选有利区的核心内容是建立层次结构模型和构建2类矩阵。以四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段为例,介绍了使用层次分析法优选有利区5个主要步骤:①根据研究区地质特征,确定目标及方案,构建目标层和方案层;②根据影响致密油富集的要素,确定准则层;③构建准则层中各要素的成对比较矩阵,确定各准则要素的相对权重;④构建各准则要素对不同方案的判断矩阵,确定不同方案中各准则要素的权重;⑤将不同方案各准则要素的权重矩阵与准则要素的相对权重矩阵相乘,得到各方案的层次排序,进而选出最佳方案。优选的川中侏罗系大安寨段致密油最有利勘探区为金华—莲池区。操作简单、不需考虑下限值、适用范围广是层次分析法优选有利区的优点,但由于层次分析中的标度根据人为经验赋值,不同评价人员给出的评价结果有所不同。将层次分析法与GIS、特尔菲法、模糊数学法相结合,可以提高准则要素的优选合理性及赋值准确性。

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making method which permits the relative assessment and prioritization of alternatives under complex contexts. This method is also applied to petroleum exploration. Based on the previous geological characteristics study,we outlined the favorable area optimization criteria of tight oil. The hierarchical model and two matrices are key contents of favorable area optimization in AHP. A case study in Daanzhai Formation,Jurassic,central Sichuan Basin was presented to show the five main steps of AHP optimization. First of all, a goal and alternatives should be determined according to the geological characteristics of the studied area. The second step is to select the favorable area optimization criteria of tight oil. According to qualitative judgment of relative importance of these criteria,then a pairwise comparison matrix can be constructed. The last but one step is to construct judgment matrices of each alternative to determine the weight of each alternative in different criteria. Finally,the multiplication of eigenvectors of the pairwise comparison matrix and judgment matrices will show the rank of each alternatives. In the Daanzhai tight oil case,the favorable exploration target is Jinhua-Lianchi Block. The advantages of AHP optimization are simple operation steps,unrestricted limit values and wide application range. However,the appraisal result varies by evaluator for the 9point scale is typical subjective or linguistic equivalents. AHP can be combined with GIS,Delphi process or fuzzy method to increase the rationality of optimization and the accuracy of scale calibration.

中图分类号: 

[1] Shen Wenjing. The analytical hierarchy process of petroleum migration and accumulation unit assessment[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2010,15(3):45-50.[申文静. 利用层次分析法评价油气运聚单元[J].中国石油勘探,2010,15(3):45-50.]
[2] Jiang Zhenxue,Chen Dongxia,Qiu Guiqiang,et al. AHP applied in the research of main controlling factors for studying formation of sand lens reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):44-47.[姜振学,陈冬霞,邱桂强,等. 应用层次分析法研究透镜状砂体成藏主控因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):44-47.]
[3] Ou Chenghua,Chen Jingshan. Hierarchic analysis method used in sedimentary facies quantitative recognition[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,1999,20(3):255-259.[欧成华,陈景山. 沉积相定量识别中的层次分析方法[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(3):255-259.]
[4] Guo Fengming,Cheng Jinhua. Application of AHP method in oil trap sorting[J]. China Geology & Mining Economics,1998,11(6):30-33.[郭凤鸣,成金华. 层次分析法在含油圈闭排序中的应用[J].中国地质矿产经济,1998,11(6):30-33.]
[5] Li Yuxi,Pang Xiongqi,Jiang Zhenxue,et al. Discussion on composition of trap exploration risk and evaluation method—Taking exploration of the lithologic trap of deep volcanic rock of Xujiaweizi in Songliao Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2002,9(1):24-26.[李玉喜,庞雄奇,姜振学,等. 圈闭勘探风险构成与评价方法探讨——以松辽盆地徐家围子深层火山岩岩性圈闭勘探为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(1):24-26.]
[6] Du Jinhu,He Haiqing,Yang Tao,et al. Progress in China’s tight oil exploration and challenges[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2014,34(6):1-9.[杜金虎,何海清,杨涛,等. 中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国石油勘探,2014,34(6):1-9.]
[7] Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhang Guosheng,et al. Conventional and unconventional petroleum “orderly accumulation”concept and practical significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):14-27.[邹才能,杨智,张国生,等. 常规—非常规油气“有序聚集”理论认识及实践意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):14-27.]
[8] Zhao Jingzhou,Li Jun,Cao Qing,et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(5):573-583.[赵靖舟,李军,曹青,等. 论致密大油气田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):573-583.]
[9] Zeng Jianhui,Yang Zhifeng,Feng Xiao,et al. Study status and key scientific issue of tight reservoir oil and gas accumulation mechanism[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(6):651-661.[曾溅辉,杨智峰,冯枭,等.致密储层油气成藏机理研究现状及其关键科学问题[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(6):651-661.]
[10] Zhang Linye,Li Juyuan,Li Zheng,et al. Advances in shale oil/gas research in North America and considerations on exploration for continental shale oil/gas in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(6):700-711.[张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(6):700-711.]
[11] Deng Xue,Li Jiaming,Zeng Haojian,et al. Research on computation methods of AHP wight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2012,42(7):93-100.[邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.]
[12] Hong Zhiguo,Li Yan,Fan Zhihua,et al. Caculation on high-ranked RI of analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications,2002,38(12):45-48.[洪志国,李焱,范植华,等. 层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2002,38(12):45-48.]
[13] Wu Dianting,Li Dongfang. Shortcomings of analytical hierarchy process and the path to improve the method[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science),2004,40(2):264-267.[吴殿廷,李东方. 层次分析法的不足及其改进的途径[J]. 北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,40(2):264-267.]
[14] Schmoker J W. U. S. Geological Survey Assessment Concepts for Continuous Petroleum Accumulations[EB/OL]. Denver, Colorado: USGS Uinta-Piceance Assessment Team, 2002.[2014-12-24].http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-b/REPORTS/Chapter_17.pdf.
[15] Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G. An assessment of tight oil resource potential in the Upper Cretaceous Cardium Formation,Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):321-327.[谌卓恒,Osadetz K G. 西加拿大沉积盆地Cardium组致密油资源评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):321-327.]
[16] Li Mingcheng,Li Jian.“Dynamic trap”:A main action of hydrocarbon charging to form accumulations in low permeability-tight reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(5):718-722.[李明诚,李剑.“动力圈闭”——低渗透致密储层中油气充注成藏的主要作用[J].石油学报,2010,31(5):718-722.]
[17] Sonnenberg S A,Pramudito A. Petroleum geology of the giant Elm Coulee field, Williston Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(9):1 127-1 153.
[18] Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al. Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing Press,2014:137-167.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,2014:137-167.]
[19] Zhai Guangming. Petroleum Geology of China (Vol.10): Sichuan Oil & Gas Field[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1989.[翟光明.中国石油地质志(卷十):四川油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.]
[20] Liang Digang,Ran Longhui,Dai Danshen,et al. A re-recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(1):9-16.[梁狄刚,冉隆辉,戴弹申,等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报,2011,32(1):9-16.]
[21] Liao Qunshan,Hu Hua,Lin Jianping,et al. Petroleum exploration prospect of the Jurassic tight reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(54):816-822.[廖群山,胡华,林建平,等. 四川盆地川中侏罗系致密储层石油勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2011,32(54):816-822.]
[22] Wang Shaoyong, Li Jianzhong, Li Denghua, et al. The potential of tight oil resource in Da’anzhai Formation of Gong Shanmiao,Jurassic of central Sichuan Basin[J].Geology in China,2013,40(2):477-484.[汪少勇,李建忠,李登华,等. 川中地区公山庙油田侏罗系大安寨段致密油资源潜力分析[J].中国地质,2013,40(2):477-484.]
[23] Wang Shaoyong, Li Jianzhong, Li Denghua, et al. EUR distribution analogous method: Application to tight oil assessment in Jurassic, Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014,25(11):1 757-1 766.[汪少勇, 李建忠, 李登华,等. EUR分布类比法在川中地区侏罗系致密油资源评价中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014,25(11):1 757-1 766.]
[24] Wang Shiqian, Hu Suyun, Dong Dazhong. Jurassic system in the east of Sichuan Province—A tight oil and gas new field of great importance in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(12):22-29.[王世谦,胡素云,董大忠. 川东侏罗系——四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J]. 天然气工业,2012,32(12):22-29.]
[25] He Bing, Hu Ming, Luo Yuhong, et al. Analysis of the fracture characteristics of lacustrine carbonates-reservoir of Da’anzai segment in Lidu-Baimiao area,middle Sichuan[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2010,3(1) :23-27.[何冰,胡明,罗玉宏,等. 川中李渡—白庙地区大安寨段湖相碳酸盐岩油藏裂缝发育特征分析[J].复杂油气藏,2010,3(1):23-27.]
[26] Lu Huixiong,Wang Yongjun,Wang Bing,et al. Application of GIS-based analytic chierarchy process for uranium minerogenetic prediction in Guyuan region[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(8):968-973.[卢辉雄,王永军,汪冰,等. 基于GIS的层次分析法在沽源地区铀成矿预测中的应用[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(8):968-973.]
[27] Vidal L A,Marle F,Bocquet J C. Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(5):5 387-5 405.
[28] Tan R R,Aviso K B,Huelgas A P,et al. Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2014,92:467-475.

[1] 卢辉雄, 王永军, 汪冰, 张恩, 王瑞军, 李名松. 基于GIS的层次分析法在沽源地区铀成矿预测中的应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(8): 968-973.
阅读次数
全文


摘要