地球科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 756 -764. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.06.0756

研究简报 上一篇    

基于海底地名命名的海底地理实体分类进展
李艳雯, 邢喆, 李四海, 樊妙   
  1. 国家海洋信息中心, 天津 300171
  • 出版日期:2014-06-10
  • 基金资助:

    海洋公益性行业科研专项“典型海域海底地形地貌特征及命名示范研究”(编号:201205004)资助

A Study of the Generic Terms of Undersea Geomorphology Base on Undersea Feature Naming

Li Yanwen, Xing zhe, Li Sihai, Fan Miao   

  1. National marine data and information service, Tianjin, 300171
  • Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-10

海底地形地貌分类是海洋地质学研究的重要内容之一,分类方法需要结合多学科知识完成。海底地形地貌中典型地理实体类型的界定也是海底地名命名研究的重要内容之一,直接关系到海底地名的准确性。国际海底地名命名分委会(SCUFN)在此领域已进行了多年的研究和探索,总结出了包含54类海底地理实体类型的海底地名通名列表。但由于命名方法的限制,目前SCUFN有关地名通名的界定原则多局限于对地理实体外表形态的判别,较少考虑其地质成因和构造性质,这也造成了许多地名提案出现了审议—通过—推翻—重新审议的情况。在分析海底地形地貌类型的基础上,总结现有的海底地理实体分类方法,并针对海底地名命名出现的地理实体类型界定争议,说明SCUFN分类方法存在的缺陷,力求寻找更加科学准确的海底地理实体界定方法。

Submarine geomorphology classification is an important job in marine geology research. The research of submarine geomorphology classification method needs marine geology, marine sedimentology, marine geotectonics and others. In the field of undersea feature naming, generic term represents the type of undersea features. Therefore, defining the undersea feature’s type also relates to the accuracy of the undersea feature names. The Sub-Committee of Undersea Feature Name (SCUFN), as the only official international cooperation organization in undersea feature naming, has been engaged in this field for many years. It mainly focuses on the generic names and specific names of the undersea features. Until now, SCUFN has divided the undersea features of global seas into 54 types and published officially the《Undersea Feature Terms and Definitions》, which includes the 54 generic terms of undersea geomorphology, and explanations and examples of every type of undersea features in the publication. However, because of the restriction of classification method, SCUFN only focuses on the appearance of undersea features in confirming the generic terms, ignores the geologic cause and geotectonics attributes. In the development of ocean exploration technology, the higher precision bathymetric data of submarine geomorphology have been obtained. The traditional method to define the generic names of undersea features already reveals its defects. This results directly in many proposals of undersea features experiencing the process of proposingdiscussingacceptedoverthrowrediscussing in SCUFN. To promote the development of undersea feature naming, the higher accuracy method of undersea feature classification will be needed. In this paper, the types of submarine geomorphology will be analyzed. The popular ways of undersea feature classifying will be introduced. Some proposed dispute examples during the SCUFN discussion will be introduced. The aim is to find a proper way to define the kinds of undersea features.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zigeng. Marine Geology[M].Ji’nan:Shandong Education Press, 2009.[杨子赓.海洋地质学[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2009.]
[2] Chenghu, Cheng Weiming, Qian Jinkai. Digital Geomorphological Interpretation and Mapping from Remote Sensing[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2009.[周成虎,程维明,钱金凯.数字地貌遥感解析与制图[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.]
[3] Chenghu, Cheng Weiming,Qian Jinkai,et al. Research and compilation of the Geomorphologic Atlas of the People’s Republic of China(1∶1,000,000)[J].Journal of Geo-information Science, 2009,11(6):707-724.[周成虎,程维明,钱金凯,等.中国陆地1∶100万数字地貌分类体系研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2009,11(6):707-724.]
[4] Yanwen, Li Sihai, Xing Zhe. Study on the specific name of undersea feature in China[J]. Ocean Development and Management,2013,(1):16-19.[李艳雯,李四海, 邢喆.我国海底地形特征专名命名研究[J].海洋开发与管理,2013,(1):16-19.]
[5] Xinmei, translated. Common Geomorphology[M].Beijng: People’s Education Press,1982.[朱新美,译.普通地貌学[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,1982.]
[6] Werner Schenke. Undersea feature nomenclature and terminology:In the past and today[C]∥The Second International Symposium on Application of Marine Geophysical Data and Undersea Feature Names. Incheon, Korea,2007.
[7] Shiyu, Li Juzhang. Geomorphic Mapping[M].Beijing:Surveying and Mapping Press,1999.[苏时雨,李钜章.地貌制图[M].北京:测绘出版社,1999.]
[8] Z C. The Science and practice of naming undersea topographic features[C]∥The First International Symposium on Application of Marine Geophysical Data. Seoul, Korea,2006.
[9] Sihai, Xing Zhe,Li Yanwen, et al. Research progress and development trend of the undersea feature names[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2012,31(5):594-600.[李四海,邢喆,李艳雯,等.海底地理实体命名研究进展与发展趋势[J].海洋通报,2012,31(5):594-600.]
[10] Sub-Committee on Geographical Names and Nomenclature of Ocean Bottom Features Second Session Report[R/OL].[10]
[11] Standardization of Undersea Feature Names(B-6)[M].Monaco: Bathymetric Publication,2008.
[12] GEBCO Gazetteer(B-8)[M]. Monaco: Bathymetric Publication,2012.
[13] K K. Basic Questions of Geomorphology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1957.[马尔科夫 K K. 地貌学基本问题[M].北京:地质出版社,1957.]
[14] Yong. Research on the geomorphological classificatory principle[C]∥National Geographic Conference Papers 1960. Beijing: Science Press, 1962.[方永. 地貌分类原则与方法比较研究[C]∥1960 年全国地理学术会议论文集(地貌). 北京:科学出版社,1962.]
[15] Yuanbo, Yu Liansheng, translated. Marine Geology[M]. Beijing: Science Press,1979.[梁元博,于联生,译.海洋地质学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1979.]
[16] Miao, Chen Kuiying,Xing Zhe, et al. Study on the principles for undersea feature names of SCUFN[J].Marine Science Bulletin, 2012,31(6):661-666.[樊妙,陈奎英, 邢喆,等.国际海底地形命名规则研究[J].海洋通报,2012,31(6):661-666.]
[17] Yanpeng, Liu Baohua, Wu Jinlong, et al. Taiwan arc-continent collision: Record of collisional & post-collisional stages. ODP Proposal[J]. Science in China(Series D), 2005,35(1):88-95.[郑彦鹏,刘保华,吴金龙,等.台湾岛以东海域加瓜“ 楔形”带对冲绳海槽南段的构造控制[J].中国科学:D辑,2005,35(1):88-95.]
[18] Zhan, Sun Luping, Fan Fengxin, et al. The basement tectonics in north of the Okinawa Trough[J].Progress in Geophysics, 2006,21(4):1 086-1 092.[刘展,孙鲁平, 范丰鑫,等.冲绳海槽北部基底构造特征[J].地球物理学进展,2006,21(4):1 086-1 092.]
[19] Tianyao, Liu Jianhua, Guo Feng, et al. Research on crustal structure and lithosphere property in the okinawa trough area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2004,47(3):462-468.[郝天珧,刘建华,郭峰,等,冲绳海槽地区地壳结构与岩石层性质研究[J].地球物理学报,2004,47(3):462-468.]
[20] Jiren, Zhao Zhixin, Kono Yoshiteru, et al. Regional characteristics of stress field and its dynamics in and around the Nankai Trough,Japan[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2004,46(4):488-494.[徐纪人,赵志新, 河野芳辉,等.日本南海海槽地震区域应力场及其板块构造动力学特征[J].地球物理学报,2004,46(4):488-494.]
[21] Chunfeng, Su Xin, Jiang Tao, et al.Deformation at the front of the accretionary prism of the Nankai Trough,Japan:Evidence from core samples[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010,25(2):203-211.[李春峰,苏新,姜涛,等.日本南海海槽俯冲增生楔前缘的构造变形特征[J].地球科学进展, 2010,25(2):203-211.]
[22] Seno.A model for the motion of the Philippine Sea Plate Consistent with NUVEL-1 and geological data[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1993,98(10):941-948.
[23] Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Tokyo: The Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names(SCUFN), 2001.
[24] Third Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names(SCUFN)-Summary Report[R]. Lima, Peru: The Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names(SCUFN),2010.
[25] Fourth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names(SCUFN)-Summary Report[R]. Beijing: The Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names(SCUFN), 2011.
[26] F W. Crustal Structure of the Tehuantepec Ridge and Adjacent Continental Margins of Southwestern Mexico and Western Guatemala[D]. Corvallis: Oregon State University,1976.
[27] Manea.Tectonic evolution of the Tehuantepec Ridge[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2005,238:64-77.
[28] K, Kasuga S, Ohara Y. A new scenario of the parece vela basin genesis[J].Marine Geophysical Researches,1998,(20):21-40.
[1] 钟广法. 海底峡谷科学深潜考察研究现状[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(11): 1111-1119.
[2] 黄文星, 朱本铎, 刘丽强, 张金鹏. 海底地理实体命名对大陆架划界的影响——以日本为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(8): 811-819.
阅读次数
全文


摘要