基于等价分析法评估溢油事故的自然资源损害

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.06.0633

地球科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 633 -643. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.06.0633

张蓬 ¹，冯俊乔 ²，葛林科 ¹，王震 ¹，姚子伟 ^1*,杜廷芹 ³

1.国家海洋环境监测中心，国家海洋局近岸海域生态环境重点实验室，辽宁大连116023；
2.中国科学院海洋研究所，海洋环流与波动重点实验室，山东青岛266071；
3.山东省环境保护科学研究设计院，山东济南250013

收稿日期:2012-02-04 修回日期:2012-04-10 出版日期:2012-06-10
通讯作者: 姚子伟(1973-)，男，山东淄博人，研究员，主要从事化学品泄露风险评价和持久性有机污染物的环境行为方面的研究. E-mail:zwyao@nmemc.gov.cn
基金资助:
国家海洋局近岸海域生态环境重点实验室开放基金项目“近岸海区突发性溢油事故自然资源损害评估体系的研究”(编号：201002);海洋公益性行业科研专项经费项目“沿海危险化学品污染事件海洋预案支撑技术研究及应用示范”(编号：201005034-2)资助. 

The Assessment of Natural Resource Damages Caused by Oil Spill Incidents based on Equivalency Analysis Methods

Zhang Peng ¹, Feng Junqiao ², Ge Linke ¹, Wang Zhen ¹, Yao Ziwei ¹, Du Tingqin ³

1.Key Laboratory for Ecological Environment in Coastal Areas(SOA),National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian116023, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao266071, China; 3.Shandong Academy of Environmental Science, Ji′nan250013, China

Received:2012-02-04 Revised:2012-04-10 Online:2012-06-10 Published:2012-06-10

下载PDF ( 1610 )

尽管国际公约和许多国家立法已将海上溢油事故导致的自然资源损失列入索赔范围，然而，在量化和货币化损害以及确定索赔和修复范围等方面尚未建立被广泛接受的计算方法。生境等价分析（Habitat Equivalency Analysis, HEA）和资源等价分析（Resource Equivalency Analysis, REA）是美国和欧盟应用于评估自然资源损害的理论方法，二者的关键假设是受损的生态服务损失和修复计划的服务收益应当相等。HEA结果依赖于生态服务价值标尺选择、服务价值水平、恢复曲线形状、修复计划时长以及贴现率等；REA结果受死亡生物数量和年龄组成的影响。HEA和REA的非货币形式结果补偿的并非生态环境，而是人类社会福祉。目前，一些货币化损失的方法已被提出，然而传统经济学家和生态经济学家之间存在争议。美国部分法庭承认HEA和REA方法，其结果为法庭索赔提供数据支持。如果将生态学和经济学原理结合考虑，将能够促进等价分析法的深入发展，推动索赔工作更加有理有据。

关键词: 溢油, 自然资源损害评估, 索赔, 生境等价分析, 资源等价分析

Although the international conventions and laws of many countries have included the ecological damages and natural resource losses resulting from marine oil spill incidents into claim scope recently, acceptable approaches have not established wordwide to quantify the ecological losses caused by pollution, scale the sizes of damage and compensation and convert the restorative ecological compensation into economical damage estimates. Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) and Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA), two popular approaches in US and Europe, were reviewed and discussed in detail. The key assumption of these two approaches was that the ecological service losses of injured habitats (or resources) should be equal to those supplied by the restorative projects. HEA which was on the basis of service-to-service approach strongly depended on several parameters, including the choices of ecological service metrics, service levels, the shape of recovery curves, the lengthens of restoration plans, and discount rates. REA which was the upgrade of HEA was impacted by the amounts of dead wildlife and their age classes. Both of the non-monetary results of HEA and REA compensated the human welfare losses rather than the eco-environment and natural resources. As so far, variety of monetization methods of HEA and REA were developed by economists, but widely arguments were triggered by traditional economists and eco-economists. Nevertheless, some US courts upheld HEA and REA as appropriate measures to determine the scale of compensatory restoration projects. Furthermore, the restoration costs derived from HEA and REA supplied data support for settlements out of courts. In the long run, combining the ecological and economical principles is promising to promote the development of equivalency analysis deeply and widely so as to make the claim rational and legal valid.

Key words: Oil spill, Natural resource damage assessment, Claim, Habitat Equivalency Analysis, Resource Equivalency Analysis

中图分类号:

[1]Wang Zhixia,Liu Minyan. Study on damage of marine ecosystem by oil spill[J].Journal of Waterway and Harbor,2008,29(5)：367-371.[王志霞,刘敏燕.溢油对海洋生态系统的损害研究进展[J].水道港口,2008,29(5)：367-371.]
[2]International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds (IOPC). Report on the Activities of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds in 2008[R].London,UK,2008.
[3]Liu Jing. On compensation scope of the natural resources damage of the United States[J].Journal of He′nan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law,2009,124(2)：159-166.[刘静. 略论美国自然资源损害赔偿范围[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2009,24(2)：159-166.]
[4]Dunford R W,Ginn C T,Desvousges W H. The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments[J].Ecological Economics,2004,48(1)：49-70.
[5]Zafonte M,Hampton S.Exploring welfare implications of resource equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessment[J].Ecological Economics,2007,61(1)：134-145.
[6]Flores N E,Thacher J. Money,who need it？Natural resource damage assessment[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,2002,20(2)：171-178.
[7]Martin-Ortega J,Brouwer R,Aiking H. Application of a value-based equivalency method to assess environmental damage compensation under the European Environmental Liability Directive[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92(6)：1 461-1 470.
[8]Brouwer R,Martín-Ortega J. Modeling self-censoring of polluter pays protest votes in stated preference research to support resource damage estimations in environmental liability[J]. Resource Energy Economics,2011,34(1)：151-166.
[9]Resource Equivalency Methods for Assessing Environmental Damage in the EU (REMEDE). Deliverable No.7：Assessment of Current Practice Regarding Environmental Liability in Member States[R/OL]. http:∥www.envliability.eu/docs/REMEDE_D7_Ecologic_DRAFT_140907.pdf,2007.
[10]Allen II P D,Chapman D J,Lane D. Scaling Environmental Restoration to Offset Injury using Habitat Equivalency Analysis[M].Boca Raton,Florida：CRC Press,2005. 
[11]Viehman S,Thur M S,Piniak A G. Coral reef metrics and habitat equivalency analysis[J].Ocean & Costal Management,2009,52(3/4)：181-188.
[12]Julius B E,Iliff J W,Whale C M,et al. Natural Resource Damage Assessment：M/V Miss Beholden Grounding Site,Western Sambo Reef, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary,March 13,1993[R/OL]. http:∥www.gc.noaa.gov/gc-cd/missbeh2.pdf,1995.
[13]Damage Assessment and Restoration Program (DARP),National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),Department of Commerce (DOC). Habitat Equivalency Analysis：An overview[R/OL].http:∥www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/heaoverv.pdf,2002.
[14]National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Natural Resource Damage Assessment Guidance Document：Scaling Compensatory Restoration Actions (Oil Pollution Act of 1990)[R/OL].http:∥www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/scaling.pdf,1997.
[15]Bishop R C. The Potential Natural Resource Damages from the Asbestos Dump Site in the Dietzman Tract, Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, New Jersey[R].Washington DC,1992.
[16]Chapman D,Iadanza N,Penn T. Calculating Resource Compensation：An Application of the Service-to-service Approach to the Blackbird Mine, Hazardous waste site[R/OL].http:∥www.darrp.noaa.gov/northwest/black/pdf/blackfnl.pdf,1998.
[17]Thur M S. Refining the using of habitat equivalency analysis[J].Environmental Management,2007,40(1)：161-170.
[18]Dunford W R,Mauseth S G.Challenges in using habitat equivalency analysis for scaling compensatory restoration[C]∥Proceeding of International Oil Spill Conference.Vancouver,Canada,2003.
[19]Zheng Pengkai,Zhang Tianzhu.Application of equivalency analysis method in economic assessment of environmental pollution damage[J].Environmental Science and Management,2010,35(3)：177-182.[郑鹏凯,张天柱. 等价分析法在环境污染损害评估中的应用与分析[J].环境科学与管理,2010,35(3)：177-182.]
[20]Hagler Bailly Services. Pecos Mine Operable Unit: Natural Resource Damage Assessment[R].Prepared for New Mexico Office of Natural Resources Trustee and the New Mexico Environment Department by Hagler Bailly Services,Inc.,Boulder,CO.,1998.
[21]McCay D P F,Gibson M,Cobb J S. Scaling restoration of American lobsters: Combined demographic and discounting model for an exploited species[J].Marine Ecological Progress Series,2003,264：177-196.
[22]McCay D P F,Peterson C H,DeAlteris J T,et al. Restoration that targets function as opposed to structure：Replacing lost bivalve production and filtration[J].Marine Ecological Progress Series,2003,264：197-212.
[23]Donlan M,Sperduto M,Hebert C. Compensatory mitigation for injury to a threatened or endangered species：Scaling piping plover restoration[J].Marine Ecological Progress Series,2003,264：213-219.
[24]Sperduto M B,Powers S P,Donlan M.Scaling restoration to achieve quantitative enhancement of loon,seaduck,and other seabird populations[J].Marine Ecological Progress Series,2003,264：221-232.
[25]McCay D P F,Rowe J J. Habitat restoration as mitigation for lost production at multiple trophic levels[J].Marine Ecological Progress Series,2003,264：233-247.
[26]Cole G S. Environmental Compensation using Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) and Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA): Is It Just for the Birds?[D].Sweden：Swedish University of Agricultural Science,2010.
[27]Ando A W,Khanna M,Wildermuth A,et al. Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Methods and Cases[R/OL]. http:∥www.wmrc.uiuc.edu/main_sections/info_services/library_docs/RR/RR-108.pdf,2004.
[28]Ando A W,Khanna M. Natural resource damage assessment methods：Lessons in simplicity from state trusts[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,2004,22：504-519.
[29]Zhang Yifei,Zhao Min. Review on the validity and reliability of CVM in evalutaion of ecosystem service and a case design study[J].Advances in Earth Science,2007,22(11)：1 141-1 149.[张翼飞,赵敏.意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J].地球科学进展,2007,22(11)：1 141-1 149.]
[30]Costanza R,d′Arge R,Groot de R,et al. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387：253-260.
[31]Toman M. Special section：Forum on valuation of ecosystem service.Why not to calculate the value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Ecological Economics,1998,25(1)：57-60.
[32]Li Jingmei,Cao Tingting. The application of HEA in marine ecosystem damage assessment from oil spill in China[J].Chinese Fishery Economy,2011,29(3)：80-86.[李京梅,曹婷婷.HEA方法在我国溢油海洋生态损害评估中的应用[J].中国渔业经济,2011,29(3)：80-86.]
[33]Cao Tingting,Li Jingmei. The analysis on the key point of marine eco-damage assessment caused by oil spill based on HEA method[J].Modern Business Trade Industry,2011,(8)：271-273.[曹婷婷,李京梅.溢油海洋生态损害评估关键点分析[J].现代商贸工业,2011,(8)：271-273.]
[34]Unsworth R E,Bishop R. Assessing natural resource damages using environmental annuities[J].Ecological Economics,1994,11(1)：35-41.
[35]Swartzman G.Resource modeling moves into the courtroom[J].Ecological Modelling,1996,92(2/3)：277-288.
[36]Sperduto M,Hebert C,Donlan M,et al. Injury quantification and restoration scaling for marine birds killed as a result of the North Cape oil spill[C]∥Forthcoming in IOSC 2005 Proceedings.Florida: Miami Beach Convention Center in Miami Beach, 2005.
[37]Zafonte M,Hampton S. Lost bird-years: Quantifying bird injuries in natural resource damage assessments for oil spill[C]∥The 2005 International Oil Spill Conference.Florida,2005. 
[38]Skrabis K E. Resource Equivalency Analysis for cormorants New Carissa Spill,February,1999[R/OL].http:∥citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi:10.1.1.180.689&rep=rep1&type=pdf,2005.
[39]Skrabis K E. Resource Equivalency Analysis for Marbled Murrelets New Carissa Spill,February,1999[R/OL].http:∥www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/contaminants/Spills/NewCarissa/RestorationPlan/Documents/NewCarissaDARPAppendix7MarbledMurrelet.pdf,2005.
[40]Skrabis K E. Resource Equivalency Analysis for Scoters & Ducks New Carissa Spill,February,1999[R/OL]. http:∥citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi:10.1.1.180.805&rep=rep1&type=pdf,2005.
[41]Stange E,Galbraith H,Bickel S,et al. Environmental assessment: Determining ecological equivalency in service-to-service scaling of salt marsh restoration[J]. Environmental Management,2002,29(2)：290-300.
[42]Nixon Z,Michel J,Hoff J,et al. Estimating bird injury from the M/T Athos/Incident[C]∥International Oil Spill Conference.2008:995-1 002.
[43]Ford R G,Zafonte M A. Scavenging of seabird carcasses at oil spil sites in California and Oregon[J].Marine Ornithology,2009,37：205-211.
[44]Wiese F K. Sinking rates of dead birds: Improving estimates of seabird mortality due to oiling[J].Marine Ornithology,2003,31：65-70.

[1]	周名江,朱明远. “我国近海有害赤潮发生的生态学、海洋学机制及预测防治”研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(7): 673-679.

阅读次数

全文

摘要