中国地区地磁正常场模型研究

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.07.0723

地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 723 -729. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.07.0723

中国地区地磁正常场模型研究

冯彦 ¹,安振昌 ²,孙涵 ³,毛飞 ⁴

1.南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 江苏南京 210000；
2.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所，北京 100029；
3.国家卫星气象中心遥感应用试验基地／广西气象减灾研究所，广西南宁 530022；
4.中国气象科学研究院，北京 100081

收稿日期:2010-03-22 修回日期:2010-05-26 出版日期:2010-07-10
通讯作者: 冯彦 E-mail:fengyan1980@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划课题研究专项“室内水下地磁定位导航技术研究”（编号：2007AA12Z328）资助

A Study on Model of Geomagnetic Normal Field of China Region

Feng Yan ¹, An Zhenchang ², Sun Han ³, Mao Fei ⁴

1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210000, China;
2.Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
3.Remote Sensing Application and Experiment Station of National Satellite Meteorological Center/Guangxi Meteorological Disaster Mitigation Institute, Nanning 530022, China;
4.Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2010-03-22 Revised:2010-05-26 Online:2010-07-10 Published:2010-07-10
Contact: Feng Yan E-mail:fengyan1980@gmail.com

下载PDF ( 1679 )

基于2000年中国地区的实测地磁3分量数据，分别选用Taylor模型和第四代地磁场综合模型——CM4计算并绘制出正常场分布图。由于2种正常场分布较为相似，为了进一步比较研究，分别将实测值减去2种正常场模型值以得到2种磁异常值，并利用曲面Spline模型绘制各地磁分量磁异常图，结果显示：2种异常图分布基本一致，以CM4模型作为正常场与国界外的地磁分布结合得较好，适合进行大尺度的磁场研究，计算的磁异常分布在国内以负异常为主；以Taylor模型作为正常场适合进行局部区域的磁场研究，获得的磁异常图正负分布较为均匀、合理。

关键词: CM4, 正常场, 曲面Spline

Based on three components survey data of China in 2000, two kinds of normal field, main field model of CM4 and Taylor polynomial model, were chosen to calculate and draw the distribution plots of normal field. Due to the high similarity between the two kinds of normal field and in order to make more precise comparative analysis of them, two kinds of anomaly values were correspondingly calculated by using the two models. Moreover, the Surface Spline model was selected to draw anomaly plots of each component. Results showed that the distribution of the two kinds of the normal field is very similar. The normal field made by CM4 has a good coincidence with the distribution outside the boundary, which is suit for the study of the geomagnetic anomaly on large scale. Nevertheless, the negative values dominate in most regions of China; On the contrary, the normal field made by Taylor model is suit for the study of the regional geomagnetic anomaly, the distribution of positive and negative values is comparatively uniform and reasonable in the mainland.

Key words: CM4, Normal field, Surface Spline

中图分类号:

[1] IAGA, Commission 2, Working Group 4. International Geomagnetic Reference Field 1965.0[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1969, 74: 4 407-4 408.
[2] Maus S, Macmillan S, Chernova T, et al. The 10th Generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,2005, 151: 320-322.
[3] Kang Guofa, Wu Xiaoping, Hu Jiafu. Global changes of the geomagnetic field during 1600-2000 AD[J].Advances in Earth Science,2002,17(3)：339-343.[康国发，吴小平，胡家富．1600-2000年地球主磁场的全球变化[J].地球科学进展，2002，17(3)：339-343.]
[4] Boles L C, Lohmann K J. True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters[J].Nature,2004, 421(2): 60-63.
[5] Maus S. An ellipsoidal harmonic representation of Earth′s lithospheric magnetic field to degree and order 720[J].Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems,2010. doi: 10.1029/2010GC003034,in.press.
[6] Olsen N, Mandea M, Sabaka T J, et al. CHAOS-2—A geomagnetic field model derived from one decade of continuous satellite Data[J].Geophysical Journal International,2009, 179: 1 477-1 487.
[7] Sabaka T J, Baldwin R T. Modeling the Sq magnetic field from POGO and Magsat satellite and contemporaneous hourly observatory data: Phase I[R].NASA/ GSFC Cont ractNAS5. 31 760,1993.
[8] Langel R A, Sabaka T J, Baldwin R T, et al. The near Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,1996, 98(324):235-267.
[9] Sabaka T J, Olsen N, Langel R A. A comprehensive model of the quiet-time, near-Earth magnetic field: Phase 3[J].Geophysical Journal International,2002, 151: 32-68.
[10] Sabaka T J, Olsen N, Purucker M E. Extending comprehensive models of the Earth′s magnetic field with ørsted and CHAMP data[J].Geophysical Journal International,2004,159: 521-547.
[11] Gao Jintian, An Zhenchang, Gu Zuowen, et al. Selection of the geomagnetic normal field and calculation of the geomagnetic anomalous field[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2005, 48(1)：56-62.[高金田，安振昌，顾左文，等. 地磁正常场的选取和地磁异常场的计算[J]. 地球物理学报, 2005，48(1)：56-62.]
[12] Langel R A, Estes R H, Mead G D. Some new methods in geomagnetic field modeling applied to the 1960-1980 epoch[J].Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity,1982, 34: 327-349.
[13] Ravat D N, Langel R A, Purucker M E, et al. Global vector and scalar magsat magnetic anomaly maps[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1995, 100(20): 111-135.
[14] Xu Wenyao, Xia Guohui, An Zhenchang, et al. Magnetic survey and ChinaGRF[J]. Earth Planets Space, 2000, 55: 215-217.

No related articles found!

阅读次数

全文

摘要