地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 192 -200. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.02.0192

“土地利用/覆盖变化与综合减灾”专辑 上一篇    下一篇

海啸灾害后印度尼西亚班达阿齐市的土地覆盖变化与海岸带区域规划
Ernan Rustiadi 1, Dyah R. Panuju 1, B.H. Trisasongko 1, Ruchyat Deni Djakapermana 2   
  1. 1. 印度尼西亚茂物农业大学规划与发展系区域系统分析中心,茂物 16001,印度尼西亚;2.印度尼西亚公共事业部国家空间规划理事会,茂物 16001,印度尼西亚
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-20 出版日期:2006-02-15
  • 通讯作者: Ernan Rustiadi E-mail:ernan@indo.net.id

Land Cover Change and Coastal Spatial Zoning in Aceh-Indonesia in the Aftermath of the Tsunami

Ernan Rustiadi 1, Dyah R. Panuju 1, B.H. Trisasongko 1, Ruchyat Deni Djakapermana 2   

  1. 1.Center for Regional Systems Analysis,Planning and Development(CRESTPENT),Bogor Agricultural University;2.Directorate of National Spatial Planning, Ministry of Public Works, Bogor 16001, Indonesia
  • Received:2005-12-20 Online:2006-02-15 Published:2006-02-15

    2004年12月26日,由于欧亚板块的碰撞,40年以来最大的地震灾害发生在印度洋。地震诱发的海啸影响到Nangroe Aceh Darussalam省的许多城市,包括省会城市班达阿齐。在这地区共有超过12万人死亡,100万人无家可归。基于遥感数据的分析表明,有12万亩的土地受到了灾害。在班达阿齐市,鱼塘、住宅用地和保护区的变化是这一地区最显著的土地利用/覆盖变化,受灾前后这些用地类型的面积相应的变化了61.5%、57.8% 和77.6%。目前,印度尼西亚中央政府正在计划一个新的海岸带土地利用规划,在原来密集的海岸带建立一个缓冲区(约距海岸带2 km)。政府已经要求许多海岸带的社区代表与非政府组织参与到决策的过程中。
    为了选择并采取最佳的土地利用方式,海啸灾害后的海岸带规划应该包括一些重要的基本要素。本研究主要关注作为该省社会经济活动中心的班达阿齐市。检测了由于海啸灾害造成的土地利用/覆盖变化(包括物理破坏),特别是农业用地和居住区用地的变化,并且分析了受灾村落的不同类型及灾害对社会经济活动造成的影响。此外,还为政府以及当地居民在灾后的规划中选择更为可持续的空间布局方案提出了建议。

    On 26 December 2004 the biggest earthquake in 40 years occured between the Australian plate and Eurasian plate in the Indian Ocean. The quake triggered a tsunami (series of large waves) that spread out to several coastal cities in Nangroe Aceh Darussalam Province, including its Capital, Banda Aceh City. In this region over 120 000 lives have lost and 1 million is homeless. Based on analysis remote sensing data (preliminary report of LAPAN), more than 120 000 hm2 of land are damaged. In Banda Aceh City, the changes of fishponds, residential areas and conservation areas (mangrove and other forest) were dominated the land use/cover changes. These three land use/covers were decreased about 61.5%, 57.8% and 77.6% from the former respectively. The central government is preparing a new coastal spatial planning which promotes a buffer zone (about 2 km from the seashore) in the formerly most dense areas. Many groups of coastal communities and NGOs are asking for the involvement of local community in decision making process.     
    In order to select and adopt the best use of the land, the coastal spatial zoning in the aftermath of the tsunami should determine several basic issues. This study is focusing on Banda Aceh City as center of many socio-economic activities. This study examines the changes of land use-cover (including physical damages) due to the impact of tsunami especially for agriculture and settlement uses and analyzes the typology of affected villages based on land use/cover changes and socioeconomic aspects. Moreover, this study examines the government spatial planning in the aftermath of tsunami and the local people needs to seek some sustainable options for the future spatial arrangements.

中图分类号: 

[1] Shoshany M, Goldhleger N. Land Use and population density changes in israel-1950 to 1990: Analysis of regional and local trends[J]. Land Use Policy,2002,19: 123-133.

[2] Barlowe R. Land Resources Economics[M]. London:Prentice Hall International, Inc,1986.

[3] Kay R, Alder J. Coastal Planning and Management[M]. London: E & FN Spon. 1999.

[4] FAO. Guidelines for Land-Use Planning[M]. FAO Development Series 1. ISSN 1020-0819, 1993.

[5] Savina G C, White A T. A tale of two islands: Some lessons from marine resource management[J]. Environmental Conservation,1986,13(2):107-113.

[6] Stone R. Conservation and development in St Lucia[J]. World Wildlife Fund Letter,1988,(3):1-8.

[7] Ehler C, Basta D. Intergrated manajemen of coastal areas and marine sanctuaries[J].Oceans,1993, 36(3):6-14.

[8] Kelleher G. Progress toward a global systems of Marine Protected Areas[C]Proceedings of the Fourth Fenner Conference on the Environment.Sydney, Australia,1993:36-38, IUCN.

[9] Yayasan Laut Lestari Indonesia, Yayasan Puter and WGAR IPB. Krue Semangat Panglima Laot[C]Prosiding Pertemuan dan Doa Bersama Lembaga Hukum Adat Laot/Panglima Laot Se-Propinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam 19-20 February 2005(Proceeding of Local Institutions Gathering “Panglima Laot”, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province).19-20 February, 2005.

[1] 吴殿廷, 张文新, 王彬. 国土空间规划的现实困境与突破路径[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 223-232.
[2] 孟伟庆, 胡蓓蓓, 刘百桥, 周俊. 基于生态系统的海洋管理:概念、原则、框架与实践途径[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(5): 461-470.
[3] 许 妍, 曹 可, 李 冕, 许自舟. 海岸带生态风险评价研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(2): 137-146.
[4] 张华, 韩广轩, 王德, 薛钦昭, 骆永明. 基于生态工程的海岸带全球变化适应性防护策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(9): 996-1005.
[5] 李海龙, 王学静. 海底地下水排泄研究回顾与进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(6): 636-646.
[6] 王金平, 张志强, 高峰, 王文娟. 英国海洋科技计划重点布局及对我国的启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(7): 865-873.
[7] 刘慧, 苏纪兰. 基于生态系统的海洋管理理论与实践[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(2): 275-284.
[8] 罗时龙, 蔡锋, 王厚杰. 海岸侵蚀及其管理研究的若干进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(11): 1239-1247.
[9] 胡宁科,李新. 历史时期土地利用变化研究方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(7): 758-768.
[10] 李海龙,万力,焦赳赳. 海岸带水文地质学研究中的几个热点问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(7): 685-694.
[11] 刘纪远,邵全琴, 延晓冬, 樊江文, 邓祥征, 战金艳, 高学杰, 黄麟, 徐新良, 胡云峰, 王军邦, 匡文慧. 土地利用变化对全球气候影响的研究进展与方法初探[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(10): 1015-1022.
[12] 李秀彬. 农地利用变化假说与相关的环境效应命题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(11): 1124-1129.
[13] 邵景安,李阳兵,魏朝富,谢德体. 区域土地利用变化驱动力研究前景展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(8): 798-809.
[14] 高抒. 亚洲地区的流域—海岸相互作用:APN近期研究动态[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(7): 680-686.
[15] 吴涛,康建成,王芳,郑琰明. 全球海平面变化研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(7): 730-737.
阅读次数
全文


摘要