地球科学进展 ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 891 -898. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2003.06.0891

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

云南石林洞穴发育特征
刘宏,周燕   
  1. 云南大学云南省地理研究所,云南 昆明 650223
  • 收稿日期:2003-01-04 修回日期:2003-06-15 出版日期:2003-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘宏 E-mail:liuhong1@public.km.yn.cn
  • 基金资助:

    石林基金项目“不同石林类型皮下含水层结构研究”(编号:199906)资助.

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CAVE DEVELOPMENT IN SHILIN

Liu Hong, Zhou Yan   

  1. Yunnan Institute of Geography, Yunnan University, Kunming 650223. China
  • Received:2003-01-04 Revised:2003-06-15 Online:2003-12-20 Published:2003-12-01

石林位于滇东喀斯特高原南部,喀斯特极其发育,以发育了典型的石林地形而闻名遐迩,倍受国内外喀斯特学者的关注。洞穴是本区广泛发育分布的一种喀斯特地下形态,类型多样。依据它们的剖面形态、成因和所处的地貌部位差异,将其划分为罅状洞穴、水平洞穴和倾斜洞穴三个类型。洞穴在发育分布上受到区域碳酸盐岩地层分布的控制,表现出洞穴分布的相对集中性、洞穴发育对地层的选择性和洞穴发育的成层性等特征。洞穴发育规模绝大多数为中小型洞穴;洞穴多为现代地下洞河,埋藏浅且多天窗,并且洞穴的发育延伸方向明显受裂隙构造的控制。通过对石林地区喀斯特洞穴发育条件、洞穴发育类型、分布特征和洞穴发育的古地理环境特征分析,论述了石林地区洞穴的发育特征。

Shilin County, which got her name after Shilin karst formed, is 86 km south of Kunming, the capital city of Yunnan Province. The karst area covers 900 km2. Among them 350 km2 are Shilin karst landscapes, which has been set as state-level natural protected area. Cave is one of the most developed karst features, too. From 1995 to 2000,  around 70 caves were explored. Based on their section shapes, location and hydrogeological settings differences, they could be classified into three types of caves. The first type is fracture-like cave, formed by the enlargement by water along fractures. There are innumerable such type of caves developed in Shilin landform areas. Such type of caves is small, 0.5~2 m wide and 20~40 m deep. Strictly, the cave was the outcome of Shilin evolution. The second type of cave is horizontal caves, which mainly developed in the Fengcong -shallow depression landscape areas, right outside of Shilin landscapes. Those caves are very complicated, in view of their shapes or genesis. The third type is slope caves, and they mainly distribute at Fengcong-depression karst areas or hillsides of lower mountains, where ground water table is around 100~150 m deep. The cave is commonly connected with vertical shafts or collapse dolines as entrance. The fast flows play a great role in the formation of such type of cave. Generally, the cave development in Shilin County enjoys the following characteristics: (1) The cave development mainly concentrates in three elevation zones. (2) The development of cave is strongly controlled by the lithology of carbonate rocks. Most caves developed in Permian and Carboniferous carbonate strata areas. (3) Small and medium scales caves dominate absolutely. (4) Most caves have active water flow and are at the near water table stage. As the ceiling rock of caves is very thin, karst-windows are well developed. Most caves are water caves, which are normally shallow buried and (5) the orientation of cave passage obviously controlled by structure fissures and there is a great difference between caves of the east and west part of the region. In west, the orientations of caves are dominant by S-N or near S-N direction. But in east  the W-E or near W-E orientations are predominant. The three water tracing tests in Tianshengguan area, the northeast part of Shilin have revealed the complicacy of underground cave system of this region: the North-south and West-east  underground water systems coexist. In low-water period, the West-east conduit-fissure system works very well, but during high water level, some water drains in N-S direction. Obviously the caves show different stages of paragenesis. Caves suffered the alternation of several periods of deposition and periods of fast water flows and flood water.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zhang Faming, Geng Hong, Li Yuhui, et al. Study on the Lunan Stone Forest Karst, China [M]. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 1997. 40-76. [张发明,耿弘,李玉辉,. 中国路南石林喀斯特研究[M]. 昆明:云南科学技术出版社,1997. 40-76.]

[2] Stanka S. Results of tectonic measurements in the Lunan Stone Forest, China[J]. Acta Carsologica, 1996,25: 438-455.

[3] Zhang Shouyue. The development and evolution of Lunan Stone Forest[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1984, 3(2): 78-88. [张寿越.路南石林发育及其演化[J]. 中国岩溶,1984,3(2):78-88.]

[4] JinJa K, AndreJ K, TadeJ S, et al. South China karst 1999 preliminary research in Yunnan[J]. Acta Carsologica, 1999, 28(2): 225-240.

[5] TadeJ S. Rock relief of pillars in the Lunan Stone Forest[A]. In: Chen Xiaoping, et al,eds. South China Karst 1[C]. LjublJana:ZALOZBA ZRC, 1998. 51-67.

[6] Martin K. Lithologic properties of the three Lunan stone forests (Shilin, Naigu and Laoheiqin)[A]. In: Chen Xiaoping, et al. South China Karst 1[C]. Ljubljana: ZALOZBA ZRC,1998. 30-43.

[7] Wang Xueyu. Analysis of the microfeatures on the quartz sand grain surface in Lunan Stone Forest[A]. In: Society of Geography Conmnission of Geomophology Special in China ed. Karst Geomorphology and Speleology[C]. Beijing: Science Press, 1985. 87-95. [王雪瑜.路南石林石英砂表面微形态的分析[A]. :中国地理学会地貌专业委员会编.喀斯特地貌与洞穴[C]. 北京:科学出版社,1985.87-95.]

[8] Lin Junshu. Fromation of Lunan Stone Forest and environmental change[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1997, 16(4): 346-350. [林均枢. 路南石林形成过程与环境变化[J]. 中国岩溶,1997, 16(4):346-350.]

[9] Janja K, Hong L, Metka P. Properties of underground water flow in karst area near Lunan in Yunnan[A]. In: KranJc A ed. Tracing Hydrology 97[C]. Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1997.255-261.

[10] Janja K, Hong L, Metka P, et al. Tracing test in the Tianshenguan area[A]. In: Chen Xiaoping, et al, eds. South China Karst 1[C]. LJublJana:ZALOZBA ZRC,1998. 99-112.

[11] Janja K, Hong L. Water tracing test in the Tianshenguan region, china at low water level in November 1998[J]. Acta Carsologica, 1999, 28(2): 15, 241-253.

[12] Janja K, Hong L. Water tracing test in the Tianshenguan region, Yunnan-china at high water level [J]. Acta Carsologica, 2000, 29(2): 249-259.

[13] Stanka S, TadeJ S, JanJa K, et al. Baiyun cave in Naigu Shilin, Yunnan Karst, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinca (English Edition), 2001, 75(3): 279-287.

[1] 牛富俊, 王玮, 林战举, 罗京. 青藏高原多年冻土区热喀斯特湖环境及水文学效应研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 335-342.
[2] 令锋, 张廷军. 热卡斯特湖对多年冻土热状况长期作用的数值模拟研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(2): 115-130.
[3] 马芊红, 张科利. 西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1130-1141.
[4] 高江波, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 侯文娟. 西南喀斯特地区地表水热过程研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(6): 647-653.
[5] 罗维均, 王世杰, 刘秀明. 喀斯特洞穴系统碳循环的烟囱效应研究现状及展望 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1333-1340.
[6] 牛富俊,董晟,林战举,鲁嘉濠,罗京. 青藏公路沿线热喀斯特湖分布特征及其热效应研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(6): 695-702.
[7] 蔡运龙. 土地系统变化的空间尺度综合:贵州喀斯特高原案例研究方案[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(12): 1301-1308.
[8] 郎赟超,刘丛强,Satake H.,WuJiahong,李思亮. 贵阳地表水—地下水的硫和氯同位素组成特征及其污染物示踪意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(2): 151-159.
[9] 王世杰,李阳兵. 喀斯特石漠化研究存在的问题与发展趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(6): 573-582.
[10] 蔡演军;ChengHai;安芷生;EdwardsR.Laurence;王先锋;ShenChuan-Chou. 洞穴碳酸盐 230Th- 234U- 238U测年初始钍校正的等时线研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4): 414-420.
[11] 韩贵琳;刘丛强. 贵州喀斯特地区河流的研究——碳酸盐岩溶解控制的水文地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4): 394-406.
[12] 蔡演军;ChengHai;安芷生;EdwardsR.Laurence;王先锋;ShenChuan-Chou. 洞穴碳酸盐230Th-234U-238U测年初始钍校正的等时线研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4): 414-420.
[13] 万军. 贵州省喀斯特地区土地退化与生态重建研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 447-453.
[14] 章程,袁道先. 洞穴滴石石笋与陆地古环境记录研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(3): 374-381.
[15] 王先锋,刘东生. 洞穴碳酸盐微层研究及其发展方向[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(3): 286-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要