地球科学进展 ›› 2002, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 582 -587. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2002.04.0582

生态学研究 上一篇    下一篇

干扰与植被关系研究的特点和面临的挑战
刘志民 1, 陈怀顺 2,刘新民 2   
  1. 1.中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110015;2.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2001-11-13 修回日期:2002-01-29 出版日期:2002-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘志民(1965-),男,内蒙敖汉人,博士研究生,主要从事干旱区植物生态和退化生态系统恢复研究.E-mail: liuzm@west163.com E-mail:liuzm@west163.com
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所创新课题“雅鲁藏布江中游河谷主要沙生旱生植物对策研究”(编号:210081)资助.

CHARACTERISTICS AND CHALLENGES IN THE STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VEGETATION AND DISTURBANCE 

LIU Zhi-min 1, CHEN Huai-shun 2,LIU Xin-min 2   

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Ecology, CAS, Shenyang 110015,China; 2.Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2001-11-13 Revised:2002-01-29 Online:2002-12-20 Published:2002-08-01

生态学家在全球、区域、局地、景观、生态系统、植被、种群、物种等各个尺度研究干扰的生态作用。就植被与干扰的关系而言,生态学家一方面关注植被对干扰的适应,另一方面关注干扰对植物种群、群落、生态系统的结构、过程和功能的再调节。综合干扰作用和受干扰生态系统的恢复是干扰与植被关系研究的重要组成部分。干扰的生态作用研究面临诸多挑战,诸如背景局限、比较局限、方法局限、认知局限。目前,大多数的相关研究是为资料(即为相关综合提供例证研究)、实证(即检测已存在的理论和假说)和实践(即为特定的生态恢复提供依据)而开展的。对植物干扰适应机制的高度的理论概括和对干扰状况下全球植被动态进行预测是目前研究干扰的生态作用的生态学家面临的最大挑战。

With the intensified interference of human activities with natural ecosystems, research in disturbance was attached with great importance in resent years again. Ecological researchers have carried out numerous researches in disturbance at various scales, such as global, regional, local, and landscape, ecosystem, vegetation, population and even species. On the relationship between vegetation and disturbance, when the adaptation of plants to disturbance was intensively studied, the impacts of disturbance on the structure, process and function of ecosystem were scrutinized by ecologists. Multi-factors disturbance and the restoration of vegetation after disturbed are popularly identified as the key aspect of disturbance and vegetation research.
Disturbance research is facing a great number of challenges, such as inference of a result from specific study to a universal conclusion, uncomparability between case studies, methodological limitation and limitation of knowledge of vegetation. Most of the present researches were implemented for the purposes of data collection (for supplying data for integrated study), verification (for testing some proposals or hypotheses) and practice (supplying information for vegetation restoration). Thus, the greatest challenge to the ecologists is to probe the adaptive mechanism of vegetation to disturbance and prediction of the global vegetation dynamics.

中图分类号: 

[1] Ypersele J P V, Verstraete M M. Climate and desertification-editorial [J]. Climatic Change,1986,9: 1-4. 
[2] Dobson A P, Bradshaw A D, Baker A J M. Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology[J]. Science,1997, 277: 515-522. 
[3] Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G, et al. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties[J]. Science, 1997, 277: 504-508. 
[4] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems[J]. Science, 1997, 277: 494-499. 
[5] Liu Zengwen, Li Yasu. On the disturbance of forest[J]. Shanxi Forest Science and Technology, 1997, (1):28-32. [刘增文,李雅素. 论森林干扰[J]. 陕西林业科技,  1997, (1): 28-32.] 
[6] Crawley M J. Plant Ecology [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986. 
[7] Li Zhenghai, Tian Guiquan, Bao Yajing. Disturbance theory of ecology and its relative concepts[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Neimongol, 1997, 28:130-134. [李政海, 田桂泉, 鲍雅静. 生态学中的干扰理论及其相关概念[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 1997,  28:130-134.] 
[8] Grime J P, Hodgson J G, Hunt R. Comparative Plant Ecology, a Functional Approach to Common British Species[M]. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. 
[9] Chen Liding, Fu Bojie. Ecological significance, characteristics and types of disturbance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20:581-586. [陈利顶,傅伯杰. 干扰的类型、特征及其生态学意义[J]. 生态学报,  2000,20:581-586.] 
[10] Grime J P, Thompson K, Hunt R, et al. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants[J]. OIKOS, 1997, 79: 259-281. 
[11] Hegazy A K. Intra-population variation in reproductive ecology and resource allocation of the rare biennial species Verbascum sinaiticum Benth in Egypt[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2000,44: 185-196. 
[12] Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, et al. Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 609-620. 
[13] Kummerow J. Adaptation of roots in water-stressed native vegetation[A]. In: Turner N C, Kramer P J, eds. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress[C]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1980.57-73. 
[14] Lavorel S. Ecological diversity and resilience of Mediterranean vegetation to disturbance[J]. Diversity and Distribution, 1999, 5: 3-13. 
[15] Diaz S, Cabido M. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1997, 8: 463-474. 
[16] Pausas J G. Mediterranean vegetation dynamics: modeling problems and functional types[J]. Plant Ecology, 1999, 140: 27-39. 
[17] Kleyer M. Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape[J]. Journal of Vegetation Sciences, 1999, 10: 697-708. 
[18] Li Hongjun, Zhang Zhibin. Relationship between animals and plant regeneration by seed Ⅱ. Seed predation, dispersal and burial by animals and relationship between animals and seedling establishment[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2001, 9: 25-37. [李宏俊,张知彬. 动物与植物种子更新的关系 Ⅱ 动物对种子的捕食、扩散、贮藏及与幼苗建成的关系[J]. 生物多样性,2001, 9: 25-37.] 
[19] Schlesinger W H, Reynolds J F, Cunningham G L, et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification[J]. Science,1990,247: 1043-1 047. 
[20] Nash M S, Whitford W G, De Soyza A G, et al. Livestock activity and Chihuahuan Desert annual-plant communities: boundary analysis of disturbance gradients[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999, 9: 814-823. 
[21] Shu Lifu, Tian Xiaorui, Wu Pengchao, et al. Effects of fire disturbance on forest hydrology[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 5(6):82-85. [舒立福,田晓瑞,吴鹏超,等. 火干扰对森林水文的影响[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1999, 5(6):82-85.] 
[22] Qiu Yang, Li Zhandong, Xu Huacheng. Study on the relation between the stability of Larix gmeliniand the fire disturbance[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 1997,17:441-446. [邱扬,李湛东,徐化成. 兴安落叶松种群的稳定性与火干扰关系的研究[J]. 植物研究, 1997,17:441-446.] 
[23] Casanova M T, Brock M A. How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? [J].Plant Ecology, 2000, 147: 237-250. 
[24] Mesléard M, Lepart J, Grillas P, et al. Effects of seasonal flooding and grazing on the vegetation of former ricefield in the Rh?ne delta (Southern France) [J]. Plant Ecology, 1999, 145: 101-114. 
[25] Yu Yunjiang, Xin Yueyong, Liu Jiaqiong, et al. Effects of wind and wind-sand current on the physiological status of different sand-fixing plants[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1998, 40: 962-968. [于云江, 辛越勇, 刘家琼, 等. 风和风沙流对不同固沙植物生理状况的影响[J]. 植物学报, 1998, 40: 962-968.] 
[26] Riswan S, Hartanti L. Human impacts on tropical forest dynamics[J]. Vegetatio, 1995, 121: 41-52. 
[27] Bekker R M, Verweij G L, Smith R E N, et al.  Soil seed banks in European grasslands: Does land use affect regeneration perspectives?[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 34: 1 293-1 310. 
[28] Hadar L, Noy-Meir I, Perevolotsky A. The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 673-682. 
[29] Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Grigulis K. Plant response to disturbance in a Mediterranean grassland: How many functional groups?[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 661-672. 
[30] Grime J P. Ecology sans frontieres[J]. OIKOS, 1993, 68: 385-392. 
[31] McIntyre S, Diaz S, Lavoral S, et al.  Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics-Introduction[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 604-608. 
[32] Parsons R F. Carpobrotus modestus (Aizoaceae), a post-fire pioneer in semi-arid southern Australia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1997, 37: 453-459. 
[33] del Barrio J,  Luis-Calabuig E, Tárrega R. Vegetative response of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi to experimental cutting and burning[J]. Plant Ecology, 1999, 145: 191-195. 
[34] Inglis G J. Disturbance-related heterogeneity in the seed bank of a marine angiosperm[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88: 88-99. 
[35] Burton P J, Robertson K R, Iverson L R, et al. Use of resources partitioning and disturbance regimes in the design and management of restored prairies[A]. In: Allen E B, ed. The Reconstruction of Disturbed Arid Lands—An Ecological Approach[C]. London: Westview Press, 1988. 46-88.  
[36] Van der Merwe J P A, Kellner K. Soil disturbance and increase in species diversity during rehabilitation of degraded arid rangelands[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1999, 41: 323-333. 
[37] Xu Qingyun. The relationship between aero-sowing effects and enclosure, utilization on the shifting dunes in the northern margin of Tengger Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 1986, 6(2): 40-42. [许清云. 腾格里沙漠东缘流沙飞播成效与封育,利用关系的初步研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 1986, 6(2): 40-42.] 
[38] Valone T J, Kelt D A. Fire and grazing in a shrub-invaded arid grassland community: independent or interactive ecological effects? [J].Journal of Arid Environments, 1999, 42: 15-28. 
[39] Campbell B D, Stafford Smith D M, Ash A J. A rule-based model for the functional analysis of vegetation change in Australasian grasslands[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 723-730. 
[40] Lenssen J, Menting F, van der Putten W, et al. Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient[J]. OIKOS, 1999, 86: 523-534. 
[41] Huang Jianhui, Bai Yongfei, Han Xingguo. Effects of species diversity on ecosystem functioning: mechanisms and hypotheses[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2001, 9:1-7. [黄建辉,白永飞,韩兴国. 物种多样性与生态系统功能:影响机制及有关假说[J]. 生物多样性, 2001, 9:1-7.] 
[42] Lep J, Brown V K, Diaz Len T A, et al. Separating the chance effect from other diversity effects in the functioning of plant communities[J]. OIKOS, 2001, 92: 123-134. 
[43] Gales K.  Effects of water supply on partitioning of dry matter between roots and shoots in Lolium perenne[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1979, 16: 863-877.

[1] 原世伟, 李新, 杜二虎. 多主体建模在水资源管理中的应用:进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 899-910.
[2] 王奕佳,刘焱序,宋爽,傅伯杰. 水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 684-693.
[3] 王丹,姜亦飞,王先桥,王素芬,何恩业,张蕴斐. 我国马尾藻金潮生态动力学研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 753-762.
[4] 范小杉. 国际社会对生态系统服务研究误区的研讨综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(6): 616-624.
[5] 范成新, 刘敏, 王圣瑞, 方红卫, 夏星辉, 曹文志, 丁士明, 侯立军, 王沛芳, 陈敬安, 游静, 王菊英, 盛彦清, 朱伟. 20年来我国沉积物环境与污染控制研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(4): 346-374.
[6] 贺缠生, 田杰, 张宝庆, 张兰慧. 土壤水文属性及其对水文过程影响研究的进展、挑战与机遇[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 113-124.
[7] 庞姗姗, 王喜冬, 刘海龙, 邵彩霞. 热带海洋盐度障碍层多尺度变异机理及其对海气相互作用的影响研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 139-153.
[8] 王飞, 陶宇, 欧维新. 景观格局变化的水质净化服务响应关系研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 17-28.
[9] 王大伟,孙悦,司少文,吴时国. 海底周期阶坎研究进展与挑战[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 890-901.
[10] 蔡运龙. 生态问题的社会经济检视[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(7): 742-749.
[11] 张永垂, 王宁, 周林, 刘科峰, 汪浩笛. 海洋中尺度涡旋表面特征和三维结构研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 568-580.
[12] 刘秦玉,张苏平,贾英来. 冬季黑潮延伸体海域海洋涡旋影响局地大气强对流的研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 441-451.
[13] 杨阳,汪中华,王雪莲,赵长森,张纯斌,潘天力. 河流生态需水计算及空间满足率分析——以济南市为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 513-522.
[14] 姚天次,卢宏玮,于庆,冯玮. 50年来青藏高原及其周边地区潜在蒸散发变化特征及其突变检验[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 534-546.
[15] 张宏文,续昱,高艳红. 19822005年青藏高原降水再循环率的模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 297-307.
阅读次数
全文


摘要