地球科学进展 ›› 2001, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 496 -500. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2001.04.0496

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

地幔对流研究的一些新进展
石耀霖   
  1. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100039
  • 收稿日期:2000-11-27 修回日期:2001-01-12 出版日期:2001-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 石耀霖(1944-),男,河北保定人,教授,主要从事地球动力学研究. E-mail:shiyl@sun.ihep.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“中国构造应力场成因的遗传有限单元法反演”(编号:49974023)资助.

ADVANCES IN MANTLE CONVECTION STUDY

SHI Yaolin   

  1. Graduate School, CAS,Beijing 100039,China
  • Received:2000-11-27 Revised:2001-01-12 Online:2001-08-01 Published:2001-08-01

地震学、地球动力学研究倾向于全地幔对流模型;地球化学研究则支持分层地幔对流。无论是简单的全地幔对流模型或分层地幔对流模型,都不能完全解释全部观测事实。为了协调二者的矛盾,人们提出了一些其它混合类模型,其中最有影响的是最近的拉瓦灯(Lava lamp)模型。这类模型目前尚缺乏有力的直接观测支持,因此,还需要随着高精度观测资料的积累和综合分析的深入,进一步完善和改进。

Seismological and geodynamical evidences supported whole mantle convection model, while geochemical ones supported layered convection model. Simple models, no matter whole mantle convection model, or layered mantle convection model, cannot explain all the observations. To reconcile the models and observations, some hybrid models have been proposed, among them, the most influential model is the Lava lamp model. This kind of model is lack of direct observational support yet, but with accumulation of high-resolution data and advances in comprehensive analysis.It is expected that the hybrid models will surely be further improved.

中图分类号: 

[1]  Bunge H-P, Ri chards M A, Lithgov-Bertelloni C. Time scale and heterogeneous structure in geodynamic Earth model[J]. Science, 1998, 280: 91-95.
[2]  Grand S P, van der Hilst R D, Widiyantoro S. High resolution global tomography: a snapshot of convection in the Earth[J]. Geol Soc Am Today , 1997, 7: 1-7.
[3]  Kaneshima S, Helffrich G. Dipping low-velocity layer in the mid-lower mantle: evidence for geochemical heterogeneity[J] Science, 1999, 283(5409): 1 888-1 892.
[4]  Kerr R A. 20 000 leagues under the Earth[J]. Science, 1997, 275: 614.
[5]  Hofmann A W. Mantle geochemistry — the message from oceanic volcanism[J]. Nature, 1997, 385: 219-227.
[6]  Albarede F. Time-dependent models of U-Th-He and K-Ar evolution and the layering of mantle convection[J]. Chem Geol, 1998, 145: 413-429.
[7]  Albarede F, van der Hilst R D. New mantle convection model may reconcile conflicting evidence[J]. Trans Am Geophys Union, 1999, 80(45): 535-539.
[8]  Lay T, Williams Q, Garnero E J. The core-mantle boundary layer and deep earth dynamics[J]. Nature, 1998, 392: 461-468.
[9]  Becker T W, Kellogg L H, O'Connell R J. Thermal constraints on the survival of primitive blobs in the lower mantle[J].Earth Planet Sci Lett , 1999, 171: 351-365.
[10]  Kellogg L H, Hager B H, van der Hilst R D. Compositional stratification in the deep mantle[J]. Science, 1999, 283: 1 881-1 884.
[11]  van der Hilst R D, Karason K. Compositional heterogeneity in the bottom 1 000 km of earth’s mantle: Towards a hybrid convection model[J].Science, 1999, 283: 1 885-1 888.
[12]  Kerr R A. A lava lamp model for deep Earth[J]. Science, 1999, 283: 1 826-1 827.
[13]  Dubuffet F, Rabinowicz M, Monnereau M. Multiple scales in mantle convection[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2000, 178(3-4): 351-366.
[14]  King S D, Ritsema J. African hot spot volcanism: Small-scale convection in the upper mantle beneath cratons[J]. Science, 2000, 290: 1 137-1 140.
[15] Zhang Jian, Shi Yaolin. Parameterized thermal model of a mixed mantle convection[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1999, 12(6): 699-709.[张健,石耀霖.考虑混合地幔对流的地球热演化的参量化模型[J].地震学报,1999,21(6):642-651.]

[1] 杨安,相松,黄金水. 金星内部结构与动力学研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 912-923.
[2] 陈晋阳. 地幔对流与板块构造的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 587-589.
[3] 傅容珊. 大地水准面异常地震层析和地幔热动力模型[J]. 地球科学进展, 1995, 10(5): 450-456.
阅读次数
全文


摘要