地球科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 404 -411. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.03.0404

研究简报 上一篇    下一篇

城市污水处理设施空间格局优化研究——以江苏省淮安市为例
赵海霞 1, 蒋晓威 2, 董雅文 1, 崔建鑫 1   
  1. 1.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所湖泊与环境国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210008;
    2.江苏省农村环境保护与生态修复工程中心,南京大学环境学院,江苏 南京 210046
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-02 出版日期:2014-03-10
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所“一三五”重点项目“长江中下游典型地区制造业转型—转移过程及其生源物质的排放效应”(编号: NIGLAS2012135006); 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“城市增长模式的环境效应、评估及适应对策: 以长三角地区为例”(编号:KZCX2-EW-315)资助

Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Municipal Sewage Treatment Facilities —A Case Study of Huai’an City, Jiangsu Province

Zhao Haixia 1, Jiang Xiaowei 2, Dong Yawen 1, Cui Jianxin 1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
    2. Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Rural Environmental Protection and Ecological Remediation, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China
  • Received:2014-01-02 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-10

城镇污水处理设施的建设和维护,对现代城市的可持续发展、确保水环境不受污染具有重要意义。以江苏省淮安市为例,以乡镇为评价单元,分析污染源的空间格局、变化趋势及其环境影响、污水处理设施需求,研究城镇污水处理能力与废污水排放的空间匹配格局。综合考虑废污水排放特征、污水处理厂的实际能力与设计能力,利用ArcGIS空间分析工具,将研究区划分为治污潜力释放类型区、治污增强类型区和维持现状类型区,对比分析废污水排放与治理能力缺口,提出污水处理设施建设与运营导向,为城镇污水处理厂建设选址与布局优化提供科学依据。

It is significant to build municipal sewage treatment facilities in cities, especially in large cities, both for the sustainable development and for the environmental protection, especially in large cities. This paper analyzes the spatial pattern, changing trends and the environmental impact of specific pollution sources. Taking Huai’an City of Jiangsu Province for example. The demand for sewage treatment facilities in the future is calculated, based on which a match between municipal treatment capacity and sewage discharge is built. Township is taken as the evaluation unit in the study. Then, the characteristics of wastewater discharge are drawn, along with the actual ability and designed capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities. Considering all of the three aspects mentioned above, the study area is divided into three types, including the type of sewage treatment potential released, the type of sewage treatment enhanced, the type of status maintained. ArcGIS spatial analysis method is necessary in the study. By comparing with the quantity of wastewater discharge, the potential capacity of treatment facilities obviously gets asked. In the future, the facilities standard need to be rebuilt and expanded in order to enhance governance ability of controlling the regional waste water, especially in the townships with multiple population concentrating, urbanization and industrialization fastest growing. Townships at the edge of urban area need to maintain the status quo of sewage treatment facilities and pipe network for future demands. Furthermore, those scattered in industrial enterprises agglomeration area, such as industrial parks, economic development zones, need to strengthen the sewer network and related infrastructure facilities construction for releasing the potential of sewage treatment. Based on that, guidance is proposed for promoting the efficiency of the building and operating of sewage treatment facilities, and then it may provide scientific basis for site selection and layout optimization of municipal sewage treatment facilities.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zhou Jianzhong,Ma Linwei, Sun Zheng, et al. A new concept for site selection of municipal wastewater treatment plant[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2007,23(2): 36-38.[周建忠,马林伟,孙政, 等.城市污水处理厂厂址选择新思维[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(2): 36-38.]
[2] Shi Xiaoqing, Zhao Jingzhu, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al. Urban eco-security and its dynamic assessment method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(12): 3 327-3 343.[施晓清, 赵景柱, 欧阳志云,等. 城市生态安全及其动态评价方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(12): 3 327-3 343.]
[3] Zhang Zhongxiang, Qian Yi. Urban Sustainable Development and Water Pollution Control Problem[M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 1998.[张忠祥,钱易.城市可持续发展与水污染防治对策[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998.]
[4] He Chansheng. Watershed science and water resources management[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012,27 (7):705-711.[贺缠生.流域科学与水资源管理[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(7):705-711.]
[5] Xue Huifeng, Zhang Huilin. Urban Water Pollution Control Needs Local Conditions[N]. China Envirenment News,2008-07-01.[薛惠锋,张慧琳.城市水污染治理需因地制宜[N].中国环境报,2008-07-01.]
[6] Huang Zhiping, Zhang Keqiang, Shen Fengju, et al. Investigation on rural domestic wastewater treatment models in Chaohu Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012,31(1):179-184.[黄治平,张克强,沈丰菊,等.巢湖流域农村生活污水处理技术模式调查和分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(1):179-184.]
[7] Yang Junchen,Wang Kun, Huang Likun, et al. Emission rates of aromatic hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons at a wastewater treatment plant[J]. China Environmental Science, 2012,32(3):433-439.[杨俊晨,王琨,黄丽坤, 等.污水处理厂芳香烃和氯代烃逸散速率研究[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(3):433-439.]
[8] Wang Kun, Yang Junchen, Huang Likun, et al. Distributions of BTEX and chlorinated hydrocarbons in three phases during wastewater treatment processing[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 25(2):186-192.[王琨,杨俊晨,黄丽坤, 等. 污水处理过程中苯系物和氯代烃三相分布规律[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(2):186-192.]
[9] Colmenarejo M F, Rubio A, Sanchez E, et al. Evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants with different technologies at Las Rozas, Madrid (Spain)[J]. Environmental Management Journal, 2006,81:399-404.
[10] Zeybek Z, Cetinkaya S Y, Alioglu F, et al. Determination of optimum operating conditions for industrial dye wastewater treatment using adaptive heuristic criticism pH control[J]. Environmental Management Journal, 2007, 85:404-414.
[11] Moosvi S, Madamwar D. An integrated process for the treatment of CETP wastewater using coagulation, anacrobic and acrobic process[J]. Bioresource Technology Journal, 2007, 98:3 384-3 392.
[12] Xie B, Dai X C, Xu Y T, et al. Cause and pre-alarm control of bulking and foaming by microthrix parvicella—A case study in triple oxidation ditch at a waste water treatment plant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 2007, 143: 184-191.
[13] Ba Yadong, Wang Xiaoyuan. Research on key points of environmental impact assessment for municipal wastewater treatment plant project[J]. Yangtze River, 2012, 43(3):65-67.[巴亚东,王晓媛.城镇污水处理厂项目环境影响评价重点的研究[J].人民长江,2012,43(3): 65-67.]
[14] Ke Chongyi, Shi Shuqian. Study on existing problems in sewage treatment plants[J]. Environmental Protection, 2000, (2):21-22.[柯崇宜, 石淑倩. 现有污水处理厂存在的若干问题探讨[J].环境保护, 2000, (2):21-22.]
[15] Falletti L, Conte L. Upgrading of activated sludge wastewater treatment plants with hybrid moving-bed biofilm reactors[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(21):6 656-6 660.
[16] Sadeghpoor M, Hosseini B, Najafpour G D, et al. Assessment of wastewater treatment plant’s performance in amol industrial park[J]. American-Eurasian Journal Agriculture and Environmental Science, 2009, 5(5): 707-711.
[17] Huang Shujuan, Chen Xiaoquan, Zeng Xiaoxue. The researching of small towns’ sewage treatment plant location select based on AHP-factor analysis evaluation model[J]. Chinese & Overseas Architecture, 2012, (4): 93-95.[黄淑娟, 陈小泉, 曾小雪. 基于AHP-因子分析评价模型的小城镇污水处理厂选址研究[J].中外建筑,2012, (4):93-95.]
[18] Zhang Haiyan, Jin Meizhu. A case study on alternate in EIA of municipal sewage treatment plant[J]. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 2001, 14(2):39-40.[张海燕,靳美珠.城市污水处理厂EIA中替代方案实例分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2001, 14(2): 39-40.]
[19] Long Tengrui, Guo Jinsong, Dang Qingping. A study on critical distance method for optimization of a city’s sewage treatment system[J]. China Water & Wastewater,1998, 14(1):16-18.[龙腾锐,郭劲松,党清平.临界距离优化城市污水处理系统研究[J].中国给水排水,1998, 14(1): 16-18.]
[20] Zhao Y W, Qin Y, Chen B, et al. GIS-based optimization for the locations of sewage treatment plants and sewage outfalls—A case study of Nansha district in Guangzhou city, China[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,2009, 14:1 746-1 757.
[1] 单薪蒙, 温家洪, 王军, 胡恒智. 深度不确定性下的灾害风险稳健决策方法评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 911-921.
[2] 王军, 李梦雅, 吴绍洪. 多灾种综合风险评估与防范的理论认知:风险防范“五维”范式[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(6): 553-563.
[3] 范成新, 刘敏, 王圣瑞, 方红卫, 夏星辉, 曹文志, 丁士明, 侯立军, 王沛芳, 陈敬安, 游静, 王菊英, 盛彦清, 朱伟. 20年来我国沉积物环境与污染控制研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(4): 346-374.
[4] 刘羽,王军,李慧,徐奴文,冯娟,董紫君,李紫燕,吉莉,郭晓明. 2020年度环境地球科学学科项目评审与成果分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(11): 1171-1188.
[5] 王军,江琴. 长江经济带多灾种综合风险评价与防范的思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 816-825.
[6] 刘羽,王军,李慧,徐奴文,张士秀,周志祥,王书兵,蒲生彦,吴国灿,董紫君. 2019年度环境地球科学学科项目评审与成果分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(11): 1189-1201.
[7] 刘羽, 张倩茹, 王军, 刘小莽, 刘进峰, 朱鸿鹄, 周志祥, 蒲生彦, 魏孝荣. 2018年度环境地球科学领域项目评审与资助成果 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(12): 1297-1304.
[8] 王曦, 周洪建. 重特大自然灾害损失统计与评估进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 914-921.
[9] 宋晓谕, 高峻, 李新, 李巍岳, 张中浩, 王亮绪, 付晶, 黄春林, 高峰. 遥感与网络数据支撑的城市可持续性评价:进展与前瞻[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1075-1083.
[10] 安俊岭, 陈勇, 屈玉, 陈琦, 庄炳亮, 张平文, 吴其重, 徐勤武, 曹乐, 姜海梅, 陈学舜, 郑捷. 全耦合空气质量预报模式系统[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(5): 445-454.
[11] 温家洪, 袁穗萍, 李大力, 王璐阳, 张敏, 杜士强. 海平面上升及其风险管理[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 350-360.
[12] 沈有信, 赵志猛, 毕胜春, 赵高卷, 刘娟. 陆地系统中的露石及其生态作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 343-349.
[13] 周洪建, 王曦. 特别重大自然灾害损失统计内容的国际对比——基于《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》和PDNA系统的分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1030-1038.
[14] 周洪建. 当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(7): 688-695.
[15] 杜佳媛, 魏永鹏, 刘菲菲, 代燕辉, 赵建, 王震宇. 氧化石墨烯对环境污染物的吸附行为及吸附机理[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(11): 1125-1136.
阅读次数
全文


摘要