地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 201 -210. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.02.0201

“土地利用/覆盖变化与综合减灾”专辑 上一篇    下一篇

巨大灾害后的脆弱性:台湾集集地震后中部地区土地利用与覆盖变迁
林冠慧,张长义   
  1. 台湾大学地理环境资源学系,台北 106
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-20 修回日期:2006-01-17 出版日期:2006-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 林冠慧 E-mail:elaine_lin@gcc.ntu.edu.tw

Vulnerability after a Devastating Hazard: An Interpretation of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Central Taiwan Since 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake

Lin Guanhui, Zhang Changyi   

  1. Department of Geography, National Taiwan University, Taibei 106, China
  • Received:2005-12-20 Revised:2006-01-17 Online:2006-02-15 Published:2006-02-15

    自2004年底的南亚大海啸、美国遭受飓风侵袭以来,人类社会如何采取应对措施以降低灾害的冲击成为国际科学界的一个重要议题。台湾在几年前也遭遇巨大的地震灾害,1999年9月21日凌晨,震中发源于台湾中部、芮氏规模7.3级的巨大地震,造成全台湾2 000多人死亡,8 000多人受伤,除了造成直接的经济社会损失外,也造成山区土石松滑、地层松动与山崩,直接改变了地表的覆盖状况。在后续几年台风所带来的强风豪雨下,丰沛的降雨量使原本因地震而松滑的土石大量滑落,造成严重的土石流灾害,河床也因土石泥沙的堆积而被提升,形成严重的洪患。这些自然环境的变化不仅再次改变地表的覆盖,也使重建后的小区面临极大的灾害风险。此次冲击促使当地居民重新思考人地关系之意义,通过重建过程凝聚小区意识,发展有别于过去的土地利用形态。因此为检验当地居民对灾害的暴露程度、敏感性与适应能力,本研究采用近年来在国际环境灾害研究课题备受重视的脆弱性研究途径,并利用野外调查以及遥测与地理信息系统分析呈现地震后的土地覆盖变化。希望通过分析人与环境系统的变化,以及人类社群的社会内部固有特质,归纳出重要机制以发展降低脆弱性的策略。
    研究结果显示,灾害是人与环境耦合系统(coupled system)共同形成的结果,非单一的独立事件,也不是不可避免的;且地方的脆弱性具有演化与多元化的特性,同一地方下不同族群与个体对灾害的脆弱性皆不同,因此灾害研究必须更关注于灾害发生的机制,相关的政策与策略也必须建立在更小的社会与空间单元上。

    Since the Indian Ocean tsunami took place on December 26, 2004, the significant outcome of a devastating hazard has occurred. Strategies that we can mitigate the impacts have been the central research theme of the international academic communities. A similar event had happened in Taiwan several years ago. On September 21, 1999, a devastating earthquake measured 7.3 on the Richter scale struck central Taiwan, and caused over 2 400 deaths and 8 000 injuries. After the earthquake, a lot of landslides occurred and had made the land use and land cover transformed.
    The purpose of this research is to interpret how people perceive a hazard and through what kind of personal, social and political mechanisms that can help them construct the resilience and adapt to the impact. It's especially significant that after the devastating earthquake, people in the impacted areas have not only adapted to the impacts, but also changed the previous land uses. Most of these areas were economically-weak agricultural and aboriginal regions, before the earthquake occurred, these areas had had high percentage of illegal and inappropriate land uses which often induced serious landslides after heavy rains. Now, six years after the earthquake, most of the previous land uses have been abandoned; environment-friendly agriculture and eco-tourism now become the major livelihood.
    In this research, we'll use remote sensing and GIS to express land use and land cover changing process during different stages, and will examine the endowment, entitlement and the social capital of the local people to deal with the impact. Our aims are to analyze the mechanism and to develop a conceptual model that could strengthen people's resilience and adaptive capacity to cope with the impacts and reduce the vulnerability.

中图分类号: 

[1] Adger N W, Brooks N, Bentham G, eds. New Indicators of Vulnerability and Adaptative Capacity [R]. No.7, Tyndall Centre Technical Report, 2004.

[2] Turner B L, Kasperson R E, eds. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003, 100 (14):8 074-8 079.

[3] Turner B L. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003, 100 (14):8 080-8 085.

[4] Clark W C, Schr ter D, Ratt A, et al. Vulnerability and Resilience for Coupled Human-Environment Systems: Report of the Research and Assessment Systems for Sustainability Program 2001 Summer Study [R]. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA) Cambridge, MA: Environment and Natural Resources Program, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2001.

[5] Kasperson J X, Kasperson R E. SEI Risk and Vulnerability Programme Report 2001-01 [R]. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2001.

[6] Kasperson R E, Kasperson J X. Climate Change, Vulnerability and Social Justice [R]. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2001.

[7] White K S, Ahmad Q K, Anisimov O, et al. Technical Summary, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, a Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [M]. United Kingdom and New York:Cambridge University Press, 2001: 21-72.

[8] Watts M, Bohle H G. The space of vulnerability: The causal structure of hunger and famine[J]. Progress in Human Geography,1993, 17(1): 43-67.

[9] Water-soil Conservation Bereau. Report on the 7.2 flood induced landslip [R]. Water-soil Conservation Bereau, Agriculture Committee, Taiwan Administration Council, 2004. [台湾行政院农业委员会水保持局. 七二水灾崩塌地计划成果报告[R].2004.]

[10] Water-soil Conservation Bereau. Information on the debris flow in Song-he District [R]. Water-soil Conservation Bereau, Agriculture Committee, Taiwan Administration Council, 2004. [台湾行政院农业委员会水土保持局. 松鹤土石流现地资料搜集成果报告[R].2004.]

[1] 魏梦美,符素华,刘宝元. 青藏高原水力侵蚀定量研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 740-752.
[2] 杨雄, 祝意青, 申重阳, 赵云峰. 2019年甘肃夏河 MS 5.7地震前后重力场异常特征分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(5): 510-519.
[3] 范成新, 刘敏, 王圣瑞, 方红卫, 夏星辉, 曹文志, 丁士明, 侯立军, 王沛芳, 陈敬安, 游静, 王菊英, 盛彦清, 朱伟. 20年来我国沉积物环境与污染控制研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(4): 346-374.
[4] 吴佳梅,彭秋志,黄义忠,黄亮. 中国植被覆盖变化研究遥感数据源及研究区域时空热度分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 978-989.
[5] 李侠祥, 刘昌新, 王芳, 郝志新. 中国投资对“一带一路”地区经济增长和碳排放强度的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 618-631.
[6] 童磊,郑珂,苏飞. 生计脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 209-217.
[7] 刘凯,聂格格,张森. 中国 19512018年气温和降水的时空演变特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(11): 1113-1126.
[8] 谢彦君, 任福民, 李国平, 王铭杨, 杨慧. 影响中国双台风活动气候特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 101-108.
[9] 郝志新,吴茂炜,张学珍,刘洋,郑景云. 过去千年中国年代和百年尺度冷暖阶段的干湿格局变化研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 18-25.
[10] 蒋诗威,周鑫. 中国东南地区中世纪暖期和小冰期夏季风降水研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 697-705.
[11] 白玲,宋博文,李国辉,江勇. 喜马拉雅造山带地震活动及其相关地质灾害[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(6): 629-639.
[12] 黄稳柱,张文涛,李芳. 基于光纤传感的多参量地震综合观测技术研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(4): 424-432.
[13] 高峰,赵雪雁,宋晓谕,王宝,王鹏龙,牛艺博,王伟军,黄春林. 面向 SDGs的美丽中国内涵与评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 295-305.
[14] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[15] 陈亮, 段建平, 马柱国. 大气环流形势客观分型及其与中国降水的联系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 396-403.
阅读次数
全文


摘要