地球科学进展 ›› 2000, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 637 -643. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2000.06.0637

学术论文 上一篇    下一篇

地震孕育机制与破裂机制的研究
周友华   
  1. 湖南省地震局,湖南 长沙 410001
  • 收稿日期:2000-02-14 修回日期:2000-05-08 出版日期:2000-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 周友华(1939-),男,湖南醴陵人,高级工程师,主要从事地震机理的成因研究与地震预报工作。
  • 基金资助:

    湖南省1998年科技攻关合同制拨款研究项目“地震应用物理机制的研究”(编号:JZY2185)资助。

STUDY ON MECHANISM OF EARTHQUAKE PREPARATION AND FRACTURE

ZHOU You-hua   

  1. Seismological Bureau of Hunan Province,Changsha 410001,China
  • Received:2000-02-14 Revised:2000-05-08 Online:2000-12-01 Published:2000-12-01

在理论上得出地震孕育发生的普遍物理机制是:地震前孕震区在垂直向会逐步形成、发展弹性的“拉疏隆起—压缩凹陷”的不稳结构,在水平向也多会形成对称相间分布的两个弹性压缩区及两个弹性拉疏区。应变的“压缩区与拉疏区同时产生、对应存在、共为一体”的这种双向应变结构是地壳构造运动中形成孕震体与非孕震体的根本区别,也是能用以首先找到孕震地区的主要依据;地震的破裂机制是:孕震体形成的双向应变结构,构成了应力集中后的失稳与剪切破裂的必要条件,当初始破裂后,就会引起压缩区与拉疏区发生逆转性的弹性膨胀与收缩的相互配合而不断提供位错空间,从而能使应力与破裂快速地传递与扩张。这一地震孕育与破裂机制的认识,几乎能解释绝大多数的地震前兆现象及震时震后的冒砂、冒水与断层的破裂、错动现象。

 A general physical mechanism of earthquake preparation and occurrence discussed theoretically in the paper is that an elastic“pull-loosened uplift—compressional depression”unstable structure is formed and developed gradually in vertical direction in a seismogenic zone before earthquake and two elastic compressional zones and two elastic pull-loosened zones symmetrically and alternatively distributed can be also formed in horizontal direction. This bi-directional strain structure in which the strain“compressional and pull-loosened zones are formed synchronously and exist oppositely and together form an entirety”is an essentially difference for formation of seismogenic body and non-seismogenic body produced by the crustal tectonic movement and also the main basis for finding the seismogenic zone. The
mechanism for seismic fracturing is that the bi-directional strain structure formed in a seismogenic zone is the necessary condition for instability and shear fracturing after stress concentration. An initial fracture after its formation can cause the compressional zones and pull-loosened zones to reverse expand and contract and in a coordinated pattern to uninterruptedly provide a dislocation space, and hence to make the stress and fracture to rapidly transmit and extend. This knowledge of the mechanisms for earthquake preparation and fracturing can be used to explain most of the seismic precursory phenomena and sand blow, water ejection, and fault rupture and dislocation.

中图分类号: 

[1] 周友华.地震孕育物理机制的研究[J].大地形变测量,1999,15(1):11~21.
[2] 周友华,童迎世,肖海.从地形变资料探讨丽江7.0级地震的前兆特征[J].地震研究,1999,22(1):17~24.
[3] 梅世蓉.唐山地震前兆的复杂性与规则性[A].见:地震科学研究论文选集——地震学、地震前兆与地震预报[C].北京:地震出版社,1993.143~152.
[4] 张兴华,宋金玲,王琼伟,等.云南地壳形变与丽江7.0级地震[J].地震研究,1997,20(1):72~82.
[5] 崔笃信.天祝—景泰6.2级地震的地形变异常特征[J].地震,1994,(4):59~63.
[6] (日)浅田敏编著.地震预报方法[M].强祖基,王振福,陈章立译.北京:地质出版社,1987.105~106.
[7] (日)力武常次,秋原幸男著.物理地学[M].郑建中译.北京:地震出社,1980.92~93.
[8] 邱泽华,张宝红著.构造塌陷地震[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.22.
[9] 顾瑾平,李清河,盛国英,等.地震波速比异常与预报应用[A].见:国家地震局科技监测司.地震预报方法实用化研究文集——地震学专辑[C].北京:学术书刊出版社,1989.
[10] 罗灼礼.震源应力场形变场和倾斜场[J].地震学报,1980,2(2):169~185.
[11] 郭增建,秦保燕.地震成因和地震预报[M].北京:地震出版社,1991.55~121.
[12] 丁国瑜,石鉴邦,邓起东,等.富蕴地震断裂带[M].北京:地震出版社,1985.114~119.
[13] 刘雄.岩石流变学概论[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.21~32.
[14] 周友华.地壳运动及地震发生根本原因的探讨[J].大地形变测量,1994,10(1/2):19~26.
[15] 朱令人,苏乃秦,杨马陵.1997年新疆伽师强震群及三次成功的临震预报[J].中国地震,1998,14(2):101~105.
[16] 周友华.地壳均衡差运动的初步研究[J].大地形变测量,1997,13(3):2~10.
[17] 刘肇昌.板块构造学[M].成都:四川科技出版社,1985.38~52.
[18] 宋春青,张振春编著.地质学基础[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1978.458~460.

[1] 唐春安. 东北矿区资源开采诱发的工程地质灾害与环境损伤特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(3): 490-494.
[2] LINAi-ming. Relationship between the Pre-existing Active Kunlun Fault and Co-seismic Surface Ruptures Produced by the 2001 Mw 7.8 Central Kunlun Earthquake,China[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(3): 368-372.
[3] 李雁玲,李杰森. 云南抚仙湖近千年地震事件记录[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(6): 906-911.
阅读次数
全文


摘要