内蒙古东部两大沙地土壤理化特性沙漠化演变规律的比较

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2011.07.0779

地球科学进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 779 -786. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2011.07.0779

赵哈林 ¹, 李玉强 ¹, 周瑞莲 ², 赵学勇 ¹, 张铜会 ¹, 王进 ²

1.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所奈曼沙漠化研究站，甘肃兰州730000；2.鲁东大学生命学院，山东烟台264025

收稿日期:2011-02-14 修回日期:2011-05-03 出版日期:2011-07-10
通讯作者: 赵哈林 E-mail:resdiv@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“荒漠化的水、土、气、生过程及其相互作用机制研究”(编号：2009CB421303)资助.

Comparison on Soil Physicochemical Properties in Desertification Process between Two Sand Lands in East of Inner Mongolia

Zhao Halin ¹, Li Yuqiang ¹, Zhou Ruilian ², Zhao Xueyong ¹, Zhang Tonghui ¹, Wang Jin ²

1.Cold and Arid Regions Environment and Engineering Institute, CAS,Naiman Desertification Research Station, Lanzhou730000, China;2.Faculty of Life Sciences, Ludong University, Yantai264025, China

Received:2011-02-14 Revised:2011-05-03 Online:2011-07-10 Published:2011-07-10

下载PDF ( 1248 )

为了了解不同地带沙地土壤理化特性沙漠化演变规律的差异及其机制，研究比较了科尔沁沙地和呼伦贝尔沙地土壤理化特性的沙漠化演变特征，得到以下结论：沙漠化过程中，2个沙地的土壤黏粉粒含量均大幅度下降，沙粒含量明显增加，但科尔沁沙地土壤机械组成的变化幅度要大于呼伦贝尔沙地，而且前者黏粉粒主要释放期早于后者；科尔沁沙地土壤温度趋于下降，呼伦贝尔沙地土壤温度的变化趋势不明显，但土壤含水量均略有增加；土壤有机碳、氮、磷含量、碳/氮均显著下降，其中科尔沁沙地下降幅度大于呼伦贝尔沙地；表层土壤pH值均显著下降，下层土壤pH值值变化不显著；导致两沙地土壤理化特性变化存在差异的主要原因是其背景土壤质地和土壤粗化速率不同。

关键词: 科尔沁沙地, 呼伦贝尔沙地, 沙质草地, 土壤特性, 沙漠化

A field investigation on soil chemical and physical properties in different kinds of desertified grassland was conducted during July, 2009 simultaneously in Hulunbeir and Horqin sand lands with same longitude and different Latitude to understand the differences and mechanisms on changes of soil chemical and physical properties in desertification processes in sandy grassland of different regions. The results showed that ①with desertification developing, soil clay and silt contents decreased and sand content increased significantly in the two sand lands, but changing range on soil texture was greater in the Horqin Sand Land than that in the Hulunbeir Sand Land, and primary emission period of clay and silt was easier in the former than the later. ②Soil temperature and water content were higher in the Horqin Sand Land than that in Hulunbeir Sand Land. With desertification development, soil temperature decreased in Horqin Sand Land and changing trend of soil temperature was not obvious in Hulunbeir Sand Land, but soil water contents increased slightly in both the two sand lands.③With desertification development, soil organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus contents and C/N decreased significantly and the declined range was greater in topsoil than that in subsoil. The declined range of soil organic carbon, total N, total P and available N were greater in the Horqin Sand Land than that in Hulunbeir Sand Land, but available P was the exact opposite. ④With desertification development, soil pH decreased significantly in the topsoil and changes of soil pH was not significantly in the subsoil in both of the two sand lands. ⑤ Primary reasons to cause the differences in changes of soil physicochemical properties resulted from differences of background soil texture and speed of soil coarseness between the two sand lands, and changes in soil organic carbon and total nutrient contents also were subject to changes in soil temperature in the Horqin Sand Land.

Key words: Horqin Sand Land, Hulunbeir Sand Land, Sandy grassland, Soil properties, Desertification

中图分类号:

Q948.11

[1]Ci Longjun. Desertification and Its Control in China[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005.[慈龙骏. 中国的荒漠化及其防治[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.]
[2]Zhao H L, He Y H, Zhou R L, et al. Effects of desertification on soil organic C and N content in sandy farmland and grassland of Inner Mongolia[J].Catena, 2009, 77:187-191.
[3]Zhu Zhenda, Chen Guangting. Sandy Desertification[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1994.[朱震达，陈广庭. 中国沙质荒漠化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.]
[4]Zhang Yongmin, Zhao Shidong. Desertification：Current state and trends，scenarios and response option[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2008, 23(3): 306-342.[张永民, 赵士洞, 全球荒漠化的现状、未来情景及防治对策[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(3):306-342.]
[5]Wang Tao, Zhao Halin, Xiao Honglang. Advances in desertification research of China[J].Journal of Desert Research,1999, 19(5): 299-312.[王涛, 赵哈林, 肖洪浪.中国沙漠化研究的进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 1999, 19(5): 299-312.]
[6]Wang Tao, Zhao Halin. Fiftyyear history of China desert science[J].Journal of Desert Research,2005, 25(2): 145-166.[王涛, 赵哈林. 中国沙漠科学50年[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(2): 145-166.]
[7]Wang Tao. Review and prospect of research on oasification and desertification in arid regions[J].Journal of Desert Research,2009, 29(1): 1-9.[王涛. 绿洲化、荒漠化研究的进展与趋势[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(1): 1-9.]
[8]Yang Meihuan, Cao Mingming, Zhu Zhimei,et al. Soil physical and chemical properties in the process of desertification on the southeastern edge of Mu Us Sandy Land[J].Bulleton of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30（2）:169-174.[杨梅焕, 曹明明, 朱志梅, 等. 毛乌素沙地东南缘沙漠化过程中土壤理化性质分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30（2）:169-174.]
[9]Liu Shulin, Wang Tao, Qu Jianjun. Soil characteristics changes in desertif ication processes in Hunshandake Sandy land, Northern China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2008, 28(4): 611-617.[刘树林, 王涛, 屈建军. 浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化过程中土壤粒度与养分变化研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28（4）: 611-617.]
[10]Zhao H L,Yi X Y, Zhou R L,et al. Wind erosion and sand accumulation effects on soil properties in Horqin sandy farmland, Inner Mongolia[J].Catena,2006，65: 71-79.
[11]Zhao Halin,Zhao Xueyong, Zhang Tonghui,et al. Bio-processes of Desertification and Restoration Mechanism of Degradation Vegetation[M]. Beijing: Sciences Press, 2007.[赵哈林, 赵学勇, 张铜会,等. 沙漠化的生物过程及退化植被的恢复机理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.]
[12]Li Xiaobing,Chen Yunhao, Zhang Yunxia. Impact of climate change on desert steppe in northern China[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2002, 17(2): 254-261.[李晓兵, 陈云浩, 张云霞. 气候变化对中国北方荒漠草原植被的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17 (2) : 254-261.]
[13]He Yanning, Yang Fang. Study on bac kground valves of environment and soil organic matter in Inner Mongolia[J].Inner Mongolia Environmental Protection, 1996,8（1）: 9-10.[何燕宁, 杨芳. 内蒙古自治区环境土壤有机质背景值研究[J]. 内蒙古环境，1996,8（1）: 9-10. ]
[14]Dai Wanhong, Huang Yao, Wu Li,et al. Relationships between soil organic matter contents and pH in topsoil of zonal soils in China[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2009, 46（15）: 851-861.[戴万宏,黄耀,武丽,等.中国地带性土壤有机质含量与酸碱度的关系[J].土壤学报，2009,46（15）: 851-861.]
[15]Zhao H L, Zhou R L, Zhang T H, et al. Effects of desertification on soil and crop growth properties in Horqin sandy farmland of Inner Mongolia[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2006, 87: 175-185.
[16]Liu Yingru, Yang Chi, Zhu Zhimei. Soil C and N dynamics during desertification of grassland in Northern China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(9): 1 604-1 606.[刘颖茹, 杨持, 朱志梅. 我国北方草原沙漠化过程中土壤碳、氮变化规律研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(9):1 604-1 606.]
[17]Zhu Zhimei, Yang Chi, Cao Mingming,et al. Changes of soil physical and chemical properties in sandy desertification on the Duolun Prairie[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007,27(1):1-5.[朱志梅,杨持,曹明明,等.多伦草原土壤理化性质在沙漠化过程中的变化[J].水土保持通报, 2007,27(1):1-5.]

[1]	赵哈林，大黑俊哉，周瑞莲，李玉霖，左小安，黄刚. 人类活动与气候变化对科尔沁沙质草地植被的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(4): 408-414.
[2]	岳耀杰,周洪建,王静爱,史培军,吕红峰,何春阳,严平. 生态安全条件下亚洲沙区土地利用结构研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 131-137.

阅读次数

全文

摘要